Global climate change. who should take responsibility to avoid climate change from government, corporate and individual discuss.
Recently the phenomenon of climate change and its corresponding impact has sparked heated debate. Although contested by many that prevention of pollution is highly beneficial. Such issue is regarded both constractive and positive by substantial number of individouals, and i am inclined to believe that government and companies can be plus, and I will analyze it in this essay.
From air pollution stand point, individuals and people can provided a society with some noticeable effect, which are rooted in the fact that clean air and health are so important. Acording to my own experience, when I was university student I had performed an academic experiment which discoverd greenhouses effect, Thus, beneficial ramification of both companies and government policy apparently can be seen.
Within rleam of warming the earth, climate change and lake of rain might increase the consequence of technology. Moreover fundamental aspect of factories relate to this reality that disadvantage of new production pertain to climate change. As a tangible example. a scientific research undertaken by pristigious university has asserted that downside of globalization, correlated negatively with goverment duty. Hence, it is correct to presume preconcived notion of manufacture.
To conclude, while there are several compeling argument on both sides, I profoundly believe that benefits of healthy society far outwheigh is drawback. Not only do the advantages of mental health, prove the significance of safe society, but also pinpoint of individuals implication.
- Do you think student who go to the universities should pay full fee than who do not go to universities 88
- The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn. Agree or Disagree? 11
- education 11
- law 50
- Do you think student who go to the universities should pay full fee than who do not go to universities 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nding impact has sparked heated debate. Although contested by many that prevention of po...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...substantial number of individouals, and i am inclined to believe that government ...
^
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...increase the consequence of technology. Moreover fundamental aspect of factories relate ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...w production pertain to climate change. As a tangible example. a scientific resear...
^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
... climate change. As a tangible example. a scientific research undertaken by prist...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 233.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.669527897 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20503458325 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68669527897 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1916363883 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.083333333 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4166666667 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118727417178 0.242375264174 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0379749129074 0.0925447433944 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516059596815 0.071462118173 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0608898377927 0.151781067708 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378786726038 0.0609392437508 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.