When designing a building, the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
it is a common belief that the intended functions of a building, instead of its external appearance, plays the most significant role in designing progress. From my perspective, regardless of many benefits gained by how a building looks, I completely agree with this view for several reasons.
Admittedly, a spectacular building can take advantage of its stunning appearance. In fact, the way a construction looks can have remarkable impact on customers, especially from the first sight. As a result, such people give priority to this one rather than a building having the same function but less attractive. Landmark 81, a skyscraper in Southern Vietnam, for example, has a magnificent and unique appearance which significantly impresses their consumers as a token of Vietnamese traditional bamboo and thus attracts more customers and gains more profits than other shopping malls.
No matter how advantageous an attractive construction’s outlook can be, the functions of the building make the most valuable contribution to its success. To specify, if this kind of structure can provide well-qualified services, it will satisfy customers’ demands and strengthen their belief in the use of the building. On the other hand, a construction covered with eye-catching design but having no practical uses can only attract people in the short term. this makes a bad impression on its consumers after they realize the building can not meet their requirements.
In conclusion, while it is beneficial to attract consumers by a building’s external appearance, I support the idea that its function is the key factor influencing the bond between people and the construction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | bqcuong | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Nguyễn Đỗ Phước | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Nguyễn Đỗ Phước | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Nguyễn Đỗ Phước | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Nguyễn Đỗ Phước | 78 | view |
- Some people say modern children's games do not develop a wide range of skills, while traditional games can be much better for developing such skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- It is better for people to be unemployed than people to be employed but they do not enjoy. To what extent do you agree or disagree ? 61
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals; during festival periods, people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- The chart below show the percentage of of five kinds of book sold by a bookseller between 1972 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals; during festival periods, people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is a common belief that the intended fu...
^^
Line 5, column 470, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... only attract people in the short term. this makes a bad impression on its consumers...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49230769231 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35338740688 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626923076923 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0115851369 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.818181818 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5454545455 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204429791019 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805048457107 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548530168157 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128359896128 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034583336219 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.