The line chart illustrates the changes in the percentage of families who own car in Great Britain during the 40 years period started from 1961. In general, having a car as an item in a British household nowadays is more popular than in the past.
As can be seen from the chart, in 1961, around 65% of British families do not have car while there was only 35% of those have one car and no families own more than one cars.
However, there was a significant disparity in next 20 years. As the proportion of British households without car dropped dramatically to 35%, there were more families that own cars. Families that owned one car reached a peak at 50% in 1981 while the proportion of families own a car and additional ones rose by 15% in the same year.
During the next 20 years period, the differentiation becomes clearer. The proportion of households who use other ways of transportation rather than a car continued to decline and that proportion stopped at just under 30% in 2001. In contrast to that, approximately 30% households have two or more cars in their house whereas the percentage of families who have one car declined slightly by about 5%.
- It is said that the amount of violence on the TV programs has negative effect on our social development and therefore should be reduced To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 36
- The chart gives information about the amount of oil discovered worldwide from 1950 to 2020 78
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems. What are those problems? In order to reduce the problems should we discourage pEople to use cars. 84
- Essay topics: Many university students live with their families, while others live away from home because their universities are in different places. What are the advantages and disadvantages of both situations? 11
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while, in contrast, in general, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6359223301 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69803798942 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543689320388 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8146942289 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.111111111 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112691814831 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521956115403 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522725606998 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0852067295459 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444214780575 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.