In recent years, there have been two conflicting views on the impacts of state-of-the-art technology on social interactions. Some consider that technological advancements have a positive influence on human relationships while others contend that they have adverse effects. As far as I am concerned, I believe that the drawbacks of technological development far outweigh its benefits.
On the one hand, those who are more sanguine about the effects of technological development on human relationship believe that modern technology has shortened the distance among people and made the world smaller. For example, many people use social networks, such as Facebook and Twitter, to make new friends around the world who share common interests. With a lick of a button, they are able to interact through their computers or smart phones anytime and anywhere.
On the other hand, opponents think that technology would adversely affect human relationship. Utilizing technology in interaction fails to deliver essential personal touch. Sometimes we just need a hug, a handshake or a gentle pat on our back when we feel frustrated or upset. However, the cute, yet unreal, “stickers” and “emojis” on social media cannot offer us real comfort, and neither can they rejuvenate our spirit.
In my opinion, technological development adversely affects human interaction. There has been an upward trend in the number of the U.S. teenagers shutting themselves off from the outside world and indulging in a cyber world. The more they are obsessed with the advanced technology, the more they become detached from reality. Eventually, they might turn into a tech-savvy geek that has no inkling of how to interact and communicate with other people.
In conclusion, people have different views on how technology has altered the connectivity between people. Some think of it as a way to facilitate human interaction, yet others fear the development of technology will become a stumbling block to establishing a healthy human relation. In my view, the drawbacks outweigh much more than the benefits produced by technology. Hence, it is recommended that people should be extremely cautious about their reliance on technology.
- Some people believe that newspaper is the best way to learn about news While others believe that more effective way is through other media Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Some countries achieve international sports by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Do you think this is positive or negative development 95
- Nowadays in many countries woman have full time jobs therefore it is logical to share household task evenly between man and woman To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 95
- In recent years more and more people are choosing to read e books rather than paper books Do the advantage outweigh the disadvantage 89
- The diagram below shows the process of recycling glass bottles. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1879.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46220930233 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23440714853 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59011627907 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1053529034 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.388888889 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24957970612 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719505591813 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449593338684 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129359289864 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440470508769 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.