People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it
In a society, everyone has their own thoughts, perceptions about different fields such as society, politics, educational systems. People of the society develop these ideas through their entire lives by scrutinizing from different point of views. That’s why it seems paradoxical that the people who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it and I mostly disagree with the statement.
Frist of all, people become deeply committed to an idea after exploring the validity of the concepts in different cases. That means people critically analyze the concepts and then accept it according to its validity. For example, in field of scientific research, at first scientists assumes bunch of probable hypothesis to explain a phenomenon. After a lot of experiments, scientists become able to reach into the final hypothesis and this hypothesis is established as a fact. Hence, there is no way for the scientist to be most critical of the fact that is established by him after lot of critical analysis.
Secondly, in some cases, people need to be competent in the ideas in which they believe in. For example, in case of politics, leaders need to be obstinate in their ideas. A leader should not change his ideas or most critical of the ideas in which he believes in otherwise he will lose the support from the public. Abraham Lincoln, a great leader in American history was very assiduous about the idea of eradicating slavery from the society. As a result, he became successful to solve the problem through his commitment to the idea although he faced severe protest. Abraham Lincoln never would become successful if he would become critical of his idea.
Finally, one can’t hold the respect to an idea forever if he finds flaws in this idea and become critical of it. Consequently, he will not be deeply committed to this idea rather he will develop him through further analysis and evaluation. Thus people advance in all fields of their lives. For example, the trends of the society change with the passage of the time. Once people believe into the dogmatic religious traditions to recover themselves from the illness but with the development of science and technology people now understand that they were wrong and they abdicate the perceptions.
In summary, from the aforementioned analysis and examples it is lucid that people who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are not the most critical of it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-16 | s.sim | 62 | view |
| 2023-03-30 | mako_mew@hotmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2023-03-11 | ramaand | 50 | view |
| 2021-10-17 | Jatin Chaudhari | 57 | view |
| 2021-03-03 | Abyaz Abid | 58 | view |
- Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 83
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individual 62
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 66
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority 66
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 582, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'would' and 'become'.
Suggestion: would never become
...e faced severe protest. Abraham Lincoln never would become successful if he would become critical ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...policy are not the most critical of it.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for example, in summary, such as, as a result, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2069.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 413.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00968523002 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72954930558 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479418886199 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6211082182 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.45 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.65 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3 5.21951772744 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.4552789998 0.243740707755 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138018870771 0.0831039109588 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.193624832296 0.0758088955206 255% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.327375685857 0.150359130593 218% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.189533691986 0.0667264976115 284% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.