The table below shows personal savings as a percentage of personal income for selected countries in 1970, 1990, and 2000.
Summarise the information by choosing and reporting the key features, and make any relevant comparisons.
The table provides information on the portions of personal savings in incomes of citizens in seven different countries in three years of 1970, 1990 and 2010.
Overall, over the course of two decades, most listed countries have witnessed considerable decreases in the percentage of saving budgets whereas only United Kingdom experienced a slight rise during the periods.
It is evident that in the beginning, people in Italy showed great prudence in monitoring their money by saving up to 29.5 percent of the incomes which were, later, reduced consecutively in 1990 and 2010 with 17,6 and 11,4 percent respectively. On the contrary, Canadians has the lowest saving ratio with 5.6 in 1990 yet the figure doubled in the next 10 years, outpacing those of UK and USA before plummeting to 1.9 in 2010. only France and Japanese shared the pattern of fluctuation with a considerable drop in 2000 and both rose to 13.6 by 2010 while in the remaining countries, people's individual savings in terms of their earnings plunged.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-01 | Naive Dinosaur | 78 | view |
| 2014-02-19 | muhammadrezkihr | 42 | view |
- Some people say that art e g painting music poetry can be made by everyone whereas others believe that it can be only made by those with special abilities Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments andlarge companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree ordisagree? 67
- The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996,1998 and 2000 for 1996,1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia 78
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons for this and how can people learn more about the natural world 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 425, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Only
...d USA before plummeting to 1.9 in 2010. only France and Japanese shared the pattern ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06547619048 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75038005001 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654761904762 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.0306510086 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.2 112.824112599 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.6 22.9334400587 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192585277618 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104428113366 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934441207259 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147495787926 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100815049301 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.2329268293 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.72 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.