Cars come in different shapes and sizes. Some prefer a large one and while others a compact one what are the advantages and disadvantages of each type and which one would you prefer?
Surely, there has been no time in history where the lives of people changed dramatically. A quick reflection on the typical day reveals different shapes and sizes of cars has been one of the prominent topic in the contemporary discussions . People have always held some conflicting views about this. This topic will discuss both sides of the argument.
To begin with, Both types of cars have their own usage. the big cars have more safety than the small cars as well as big cars have much acceleration and better controlling system .big cars have more space and they are more comfortable than the compact cars but the compact cars have good mileage as well as they are cheaper than the big cars. For instance the cars like swift, alto have more mileage than large cars like Fortune, Audi. moreover the expenditure of small cars are less compare to big cars.
On the other hand, the both types of cars have some disadvantages. The small cars have less features than the large cars. Small cars have less safety, simple controlling system and low acceleration but the big cars have less mileage as well as the price of large cars are high and they have more expenditure than the compact cars.
In conclusion, both cars are good but I would prefer large cars because they have more safety featurs and more comfortable for travelling long distance as well as they have more space for carry more things.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-20 | sushant.lahoti2005@gmail.com | 55 | view |
| 2019-06-03 | amritpal223 | 55 | view |
| 2018-07-18 | Arvind505666 | 52 | view |
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged product or it is the responsibility of producers? 72
- Children in numerous nations prefer more fast food and snacks. Discuss causes, effects and solutions of it. 72
- Should parents be held legally responsible for children's actions? 88
- With the rise in use of internet facilities result in generation of several problem in our society. Discuss the problem and its solution ? 77
- The environment we live in is in danger due to various problems. What are the underlying causes? Who is responsible to combat this? 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nt topic in the contemporary discussions . People have always held some conflictin...
^^
Line 2, column 56, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...oth types of cars have their own usage. the big cars have more safety than the smal...
^^^
Line 2, column 178, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...celeration and better controlling system .big cars have more space and they are mo...
^^
Line 2, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re comfortable than the compact cars but the compact cars have good mileage as we...
^^
Line 2, column 437, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...age than large cars like Fortune, Audi. moreover the expenditure of small cars are less ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 437, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: moreover,
...age than large cars like Fortune, Audi. moreover the expenditure of small cars are less ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun features is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...some disadvantages. The small cars have less features than the large cars. Small car...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 20.9802955665 43% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 31.9359605911 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1157.0 1207.87684729 96% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72244897959 5.00649968141 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34289209462 2.71678728327 86% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 139.433497537 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.444897959184 0.580463131201 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 365.4 379.143842365 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.3982021595 50.4703680194 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4166666667 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4166666667 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154612595715 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692181395935 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049614843272 0.071462118173 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0998085326014 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0116077763135 0.0609392437508 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 12.6369458128 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.1260098522 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.5310837438 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.32886699507 87% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 55.0591133005 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.