It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The author propounds that the first indicator of an individual’s characteristics is the social groups in which he is a member. This is the claim with which I generally do concur, among the countless backing reasons for my perspective, I will delve into the most conspicuous ones in the following paragraphs.
First of all, this fact should be highlighted in the initial step of the writing that mankind’s interaction with the surrounding and his membership in the various group alter by the passage of time from his childhood till the adulthood. If the phase of childhood is considered, a newborn connects with his surrounding with a mere group which his parents and his first membership is in the group of family. In this state, since the child is naïve and physically and mentally depended on his parents, all the manner taken by the mother and father will be a solo role model for the kid. Actually, the kid at this step is just as an empty container which fills by data conveyed from his parents; therefore, the ultimate characteristic of the child will be fixed behavior imitated from the father and mother. This fact also verifies by the recent research conducted by the Psychology Department of Tehran University. According to this study between the age of 0 to 5 before the attendance to the preschool or kindergarten, the children’s behavior has sixty percent alignment and match with their parents’. Therefore, in this stage of life, the indicator of the personal characteristic of a kid is his initial connected groups, his family.
At the second phase, the child enters the bigger society and become a social person; at this stage, he does not possess the previous simplicity and naivety; however, he does not have sufficient knowledge over the life; so, he is eager for learning about the events going around him. According to this conditions and eagerness, his interaction will be based on the learning and gaining novel attitudes about the universe; in addition, his connection with other groups will be according to his wish for exploration and expansion of his understating. There is the probability of the alteration of attitude in the adolescent since maybe there will be confliction between his earned trend from his parents and his currently tracked environment; however, the new trend will be shaped based on the new group with which he hanging out. Therefore, his interaction with the social groups will the concrete identity of his perspective to the world and eagerness.
Finally, at the level of adulthood, mankind earns his identity there is a rare possibility of the alteration in his tendency; in this case, his membership in a specific group will be for the sake of attraction of that group. Indeed, a human being in his adulthood gains the adequate level of awareness over his environment and make all the decisions based on his previous cognition; furthermore, he is a liberal person and participates in any group without any burden on his freedom. As long as the group seems appealing for a specific guy and match with his standpoint to the world, he will continue his membership. Therefore, at this level of life, the connected group also entirely shows mankind’s identity.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons explicitly depict the accuracy of a proposed claim by the author. Regardless of the person's age and knowledge, his interaction with surrounding is the representer of his characteristic.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | Vaibhav Panchal | 58 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Persian Moonlight | 70 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2019-08-28 | pankajsolanki4007 | 50 | view |
- Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagre 40
- 1.The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine."A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep 55
- tpo2.1 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who just focus on only one skill. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The food we ate in the past was healthier than the food we eat today 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e events going around him. According to this conditions and eagerness, his interacti...
^^^^
Line 4, column 717, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...entirely shows mankind's identity. To wrap it up, all the aforementioned re...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... claim by the author. Regardless of the persons age and knowledge, his interaction with...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 93.0 58.6224719101 159% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2899.0 2235.4752809 130% => OK
No of words: 574.0 442.535393258 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05052264808 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89472135074 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05705646272 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456445993031 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 895.5 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.38483146067 296% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.4550260077 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.578947368 118.986275619 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2105263158 23.4991977007 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84210526316 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104816643345 0.243740707755 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491425924094 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376688664697 0.0758088955206 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0831017774322 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363640367311 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 48.8420337079 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 146.0 100.480337079 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.