According to a recent study, the more time people use the Internet, the less time they spend with real human beings. Some people say that instead of seeing the Internet as a way of opening up new communication possibilities world- wide, we should be concerned about the effect this is having on social interaction.
How far do you agree with this opinion?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.
During the ages, human beings life style has been changed repeatly. It is clear that internet widly effects on communications, relationships, people daily affords, and sociaty. A group of people believe that the internet is benefitfull and it can make relations easier as the past and improve sociaty communications. In this essay, I would arque about my positive opinion and write down some causes and give some instances about internet advantageouses. Generally speaking, the internet is an accessable communication way. The internet was changed to a global network and almost all cities, and villages people can easily connect to it. For example a rural woman can chat with her boy who study in the other city. The second property for the internet is multi dimention. People can communicate over the internet by social media, like facebook.com and whatsapp, and share pictures, send voices and instant messages, capture and transfer videos, and make a video call and talk to each other directly.
The fastest, securest, and cheapest choice for make a social communications is the internet. As I mentioned before, travel and meet a friend is more costly than virtual meetings. The internet can to design world wide web and omitted a lot of phisical distances by replacing some virtual solutions. For instance, An American people can connect to an Iranian person in some seconds that is not compareable with other traditional selects like post a letter.
In conclusion, The internet has so many benefits for people communications by omitted the distances, and added a lot of abilities like video chat and it is roughly accessable everywhere by a fairtrade cost. It is necessary to train people and develop the culture of using the internet.
- According to a recent study, the more time people use the Internet, the less time they spend with real human beings. Some people say that instead of seeing the Internet as a way of opening up new communication possibilities world- wide, we should be conce 56
- The chart shows British Emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007. 78
- The graph shows average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010. 61
- When a country develops its technology the traditional skills and ways of life die out It is pointless to try and keep them alive To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 92
- The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
During the ages, human beings life style has been changed repeatly. I...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 62, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'communication'?
Suggestion: communication
..., and cheapest choice for make a social communications is the internet. As I mentioned before,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14084507042 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92237399861 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580985915493 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9203434166 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3333333333 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73333333333 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249793782993 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892206527931 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391996492353 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174185785537 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02467123611 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.