Some people think a job not only provides income but also a social life. Others think it is better to develop social life with people you do not work with. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
A faction of people believe that an occupation does not only bring the financial benefit but also a kind of social life. However, others keep in mind that it is more worthy enhancing the social relationship including none of your colleagues. And hence, I will try to throw light upon this declaration as well as posit my perspective about it.
On the one hand, there are multifarious reasons that shores those people considering the career environment as a society. The first one to be mentioned is that, people you work with are not just your workmates. Obviously, except for the working stratification, they could also be friends at the office, for instance: helping each other a bit when working, having a little confabulation or even hanging out after worktime. Probing further, to maintain the connection with colleagues is just the same happening with any of your friends. Apparently, to get on well with each other, even the one you distaste at the office, is vital because that might lead to the result of the business.
On the other hand, apart from people at the workplace, to get acquainted with who are not involved in your job surely boosts people up. Of course, those people can be their neighbors, old classmates,...Then to make friends with them could be stressfree since people can confess any of problems belonging to the enterprises. Additionally, they may be able to give some smart advice to overcome the company pressure.To explain, they do not get involved in the defiance so they are prone to inspiring the solution.
Conclusively, both 2 opinions are reasonable. Therefore, I pertinaciously believe that having fellows not involved in people's business far outweighs the relationship with workmates.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-15 | Lê Võ Nhật Quang | 67 | view |
| 2019-02-16 | yaldaasgari | 67 | view |
| 2019-02-16 | yaldaasgari | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-20 | Traxie_Nguyen | 95 | view |
| 2018-06-01 | deepthi sankar | 56 | view |
- The graph below shows information about the recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2001 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 55
- The chart below shows participation in certain leisure activities by children in Australia. 67
- The best way to resolve the world environmetal problems is to increase the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree ? 89
- If countries are serious about solving traffic problems they should tax private cars very heavily and use the money to provide free or very cheap rail travel 69
- Nowadays, more and more people decide to have children later in their life. What are the reasons? What are the effects on society and family life? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...e can be their neighbors, old classmates,...Then to make friends with them could b...
^^
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Then
...n be their neighbors, old classmates,...Then to make friends with them could be stre...
^^^^
Line 5, column 415, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...advice to overcome the company pressure.To explain, they do not get involved in th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, hence, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, apart from, except for, for instance, kind of, of course, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10175438596 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99272535454 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60701754386 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7344905947 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.846153846 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06120827912 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317557609262 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104528736563 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628613283819 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168951132671 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190692762628 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.