three major problems in London during 3 years.
The line chart illustrates the proportion of the 3 most outstanding problems: litter, air quality and noise in London in the period of 3 years.
At the first glance, we can figure out that litter occupies the majority, whereas noise is considered as the least worried pollution.
It is obvious that during 3 years, litter takes over the highest rank with around 70% of the first year. The chart indicates the surge of litter among year 1 and year 2, nearly 6% in total. Since then, the percentage of littler tends to drop gradually in year 3, from 76% to 68%. Unlike litter, air quality shows a reduction in year 2 and a slightly raise in year 3.
There is dramatic gap in comparison with noise pollution and the others, 58% in the first year and the number keeps falling considerably until year 3, at around 52%
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
2023-10-12 | reverjae | 73 | view |
2023-10-07 | Phuong1810 | 11 | view |
2023-10-07 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
2023-09-11 | Lananhtranhanoi | 67 | view |
- Some people think that a sense of competition should be encouraged. Others believe that children who are taught to co-operate rather than compete become more useful adults.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The graph below shows the information on waste disposal in European country from 2005 to 2008. 78
- Nowadays, more and more people decide to have children later in their life. What are the reasons? What are the effects on society and family life? 67
- three major problems in London during 3 years. 56
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the graph below.» Write at least 150 words. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 341, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('raise') instead of another adjective.
...quality shows a reduction in year 2 and a slightly raise in year 3. There is dramatic gap in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 18, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly raise in year 3. There is dramatic gap in comparison with noise pollution a...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nsiderably until year 3, at around 52%
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 681.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 147.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63265306122 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48200454523 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46710976055 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 191.7 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7774054872 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2857142857 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0689211149815 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365496809547 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578062793822 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0441420635214 0.15604864568 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513428593448 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.