The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impact?
In this modern society, family sitting together to have dinner is getting more and more infrequent. Some explanations for this problem will be put forward before a few consequences are named.
There are several reasons as to why there is less time for family meals these days. First of all, time flew and things changed, modern life style, especially in the urban areas, requires people spending most time for work. As a result, people will have less leisure time for other activities and their family. Instead of spending time preparing for the meal and sitting around to eat together, they are rather replace family dinner by all kinds of fast food and canned food to save time for work. The other reason for this problem is the more develop this world is, the more significant the difference between generational mindset will be. Nowadays, the youngsters don’t understand the remarkable means behind the family meals which lead to their superficial attitude toward the meals.
And of cause the disappearance of family meals will certainly have some impacts. The most serious result is losing the bones between family’s members. Because having dinner together brings quality time for every member to enhance their relationship with each other by sharing about their daily occupation, their feeling which will totally draw the family close together. And on the generality perspective, the other impact will be the disappearance of one cultural tradition. Due to the significant position of family meals in some specific countries, especially in Asia, the decrease of family meals which one day will be the disappearance will lead to the loss of one important tradition which is cherished attitude toward family and ancestors.
To conclude, there are a few reasons why the tradition that family eating together is fading, including the fact that the modern society has remarkable changed. There are some impacts of this problem, such as decreasing family sentiment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-25 | ludovicag | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-22 | minhanh2410 | 73 | view |
- Task 1: The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013. 73
- the picture illustrate the the working principals of a hot balloon 78
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the 73
- People are living in a ‘throwaway society’, using things for a short time and then throwing them away. What are the causes of this? What problems does it lead to? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 411, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'replaced'.
Suggestion: replaced
...around to eat together, they are rather replace family dinner by all kinds of fast food...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 5, Rule ID: OF_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'of course' (=naturally)?
Suggestion: of course
...icial attitude toward the meals. And of cause the disappearance of family meals will ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, as to, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24842767296 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63963133294 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512578616352 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5778126909 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.266666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73333333333 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204018787456 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793187913881 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619665053186 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145977282323 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630542479894 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.