The given map elucidates the view of the island, before and after the construction of facilities for tourists.
It can be clearly seen that the island witnessed huge changes after renovation. It comprises the building of Restaurants, Reception, and Pier to provide accommodation facility to the travelers. In addition, there are also footpath and vehicle tracking system for tourists to guide them for going anywhere on the island.
According to the data, In the previous state, the island only had the appearance of natural plants and sea. However, the beach is currently used as a swimming pool and trees were surrounded by accommodations. In the central area of the island, the tourist easily gets to the available reception to find information.
To wrap up, previously island is covered by the sea from the back and front area. In present, it is developed and had the boating adventure for the tourists to explore and experience the valuable insights around and in the sea.
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some teachers said that it is helpful to do study in group while others believe that it is good to study alone. Give your opinion and describe both the views. 73
- The chart below shows estimated world illiteracy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000. 67
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disvantages? 73
- The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 827.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1049382716 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88989773458 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62962962963 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.2122646013 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.8888888889 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201919080289 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777067753181 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799670051082 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133203082735 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866210202558 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.