In 2005 Japan had the highest median age of all countries in the world, while Australia's population was only moderately aged. Some 50 years ago the demographic situation was quite different, with the median age of Australia's population being seven years older than Japan's.
The ageing of the population is a major issue for Australian policy makers, particularly in regard to the long-term implications for reduced economic growth and the increasing demand for Age Pensions, and health and aged care services. As the population ages, growth in the number of people of working age will slow, while the proportion of people of retirement age will increase.
Sustained population ageing also leads to slowing or negative population growth. While declining population growth in developed countries is welcomed by some environmentalist and social scientists, economists tend to agree that population decline brings gloomy economic prospects. In addition to the decrease in the labour supply, the demand side of the economy may be affected through shrinking markets for goods and services.
How quickly this occurs depends on the dynamics of fertility, mortality and overseas migration. While a moderate pace of demographic change allows for gradual adjustment of the economy and policies to the changing population demographics, rapid changes are more difficult to manage. As a result, governments and society as a whole may need to take actions to address these issues. But how severe is the ageing of Australia's population, relative to other countries?
One way of applying a degree of perspective to the ageing debate is to compare ageing in Australia with that of other countries. This article examines the population structures in Australia and Japan and the demographic forces that shape the respective populations, both historically and projections for the future.
Whereas the fundamental essence of median age of all countries emphasizes the significance of regarding to the long-term implications for the corresponding impacts of major issue such as reducing economic growth and increasing demand for Age Pensions are acknowledged, and slowing or negative population growth could be inferred evidently from sustaining population ageing, which the potential implications of both historically and projections for the future are presumed.
- Some people argue that young people should concentrate on study or work. Some people think it is better to put energy in activities designed to broaden their experience, such as international travel and volunteering. Support with examples or cases. 55
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree? 88
- Some people argue that young people should concentrate on study or work. Some people think it is better to put energy in activities designed to broaden their experience, such as international travel and volunteering. Support with examples or cases. 55
- Some people think the purpose of education is to prepare the future workforce and make good members of society. Others think the purpose of education should lead to self-fulfillment. What is your opinion? 88
- Learning and activities 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.5418719212 28% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 0.0 20.9802955665 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 31.9359605911 25% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 406.0 1207.87684729 34% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 67.0 242.827586207 28% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.05970149254 5.00649968141 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 2.86100555258 3.92707691288 73% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37630283097 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 49.0 139.433497537 35% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.731343283582 0.580463131201 126% => OK
syllable_count: 128.7 379.143842365 34% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.65517241379 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 12.6551724138 8% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 67.0 20.5024630542 327% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 50.4703680194 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 406.0 104.977214359 387% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 67.0 20.9669160288 320% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 31.0 7.25397266985 427% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.12807881773 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 6.9802955665 14% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142076820239 0.242375264174 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142076820239 0.0925447433944 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.071462118173 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142076820239 0.151781067708 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 40.6 12.6369458128 321% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -21.91 53.1260098522 -41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.54236453202 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 33.0 10.9458128079 301% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 19.05 11.5310837438 165% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 14.03 8.32886699507 168% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 55.0591133005 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 45.5 9.94827586207 457% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 28.8 10.3980295567 277% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 29.0 10.5123152709 276% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Rates: 22.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.