Learning and activities
Recently, the phenomenon of arguing about young people concentration on study and work and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that putting energy in activities designed to broaden their experience can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay. From a general standpoint, young people concentration on study and work arguing can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen. Within a realm of a public arena, putting energy in activities designed to broaden their experience such as international traveling and volunteering and concentration on study or work might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments, I profoundly believe that the benefits of arguing about young people concentration on study and work far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-18 | topraveesh | 88 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Rafia Jawad | 55 | view |
| 2023-01-30 | Alireza.r.m | 88 | view |
| 2022-01-03 | Vũ Thùy Dương | 77 | view |
| 2020-07-11 | Alireza.r.m | 88 | view |
- Travelling to study is over-rated. We have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really necessary for tertiary studies? 88
- In 2005 Japan had the highest median age of all countries in the world while Australia s population was only moderately aged Some 50 years ago the demographic situation was quite different with the median age of Australia s population being seven years ol 61
- Some people argue that young people should concentrate on study or work. Some people think it is better to put energy in activities designed to broaden their experience, such as international travel and volunteering. Support with examples or cases. 55
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree? 88
- Some people argue that young people should concentrate on study or work. Some people think it is better to put energy in activities designed to broaden their experience, such as international travel and volunteering. Support with examples or cases. 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1454, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...ed notion of this remarkable phenomenon.To conclude, while there are several compe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75939849624 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3429318903 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62030075188 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.0433137908 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.2 104.977214359 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3 7.25397266985 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.12807881773 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0466286350841 0.242375264174 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0185534325496 0.0925447433944 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371980034188 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0466286350841 0.151781067708 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 12.6369458128 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.71 53.1260098522 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 10.9458128079 155% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.