Learning and activities
Recently, the phenomenon of young people studies and work and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that designed activity can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.From a general standpoint, international travel can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures, apparently can be seen.Within a realm of a public arena, putting energy to broaden their experience might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments, I profoundly believe that the benefits of concentrating on study and work far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-18 | topraveesh | 88 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Rafia Jawad | 55 | view |
| 2023-01-30 | Alireza.r.m | 88 | view |
| 2022-01-03 | Vũ Thùy Dương | 77 | view |
| 2020-07-11 | Alireza.r.m | 88 | view |
- Travelling to study is over-rated. We have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really necessary for tertiary studies? 88
- Some people argue that young people should concentrate on study or work. Some people think it is better to put energy in activities designed to broaden their experience, such as international travel and volunteering. Support with examples or cases. 55
- Learning and activities 11
- Some people argue that young people should concentrate on study or work. Some people think it is better to put energy in activities designed to broaden their experience, such as international travel and volunteering. Support with examples or cases. 55
- Some people argue that young people should concentrate on study or work. Some people think it is better to put energy in activities designed to broaden their experience, such as international travel and volunteering. Support with examples or cases. 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 377, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: From
...will analyze that throughout this essay.From a general standpoint, international tra...
^^^^
Line 1, column 840, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Within
...ated procedures, apparently can be seen.Within a realm of a public arena, putting ener...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1238, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...ed notion of this remarkable phenomenon.To conclude, while there are several compe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 228.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8201754386 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37796471019 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.706140350877 0.580463131201 122% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6551724138 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.5024630542 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.1909991743 50.4703680194 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.875 104.977214359 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 20.9669160288 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.75 7.25397266985 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.12807881773 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0277780500973 0.242375264174 11% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00853372492481 0.0925447433944 9% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0225781139081 0.071462118173 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0277780500973 0.151781067708 18% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 12.6369458128 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 17.68 53.1260098522 33% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.8 10.9458128079 163% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.74 8.32886699507 141% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.3980295567 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.