solution for the problem of declining frogs population
The reading and listening have a debate on the problem of declining in number of frogs. The reading puts forward three solutions to solve this problem, which are rebutted by the following lecture.
The first solution according to the reading is to enforce law that prevent farmers near the endangered frogs' habitates (habitats) from utilizing the harmful pesticides. However, the reading disputes this statement because regulation of pesticides using is not economically pratical (practical) or fair. Farmers count on the pesticides to keep competitive against others. So, the restriction of pesticides using will give rise to losing crops and a lower yield for the framers near the sensitive frog population.
The second solution is to give antifungal medication to the frogs, thereby protecting the frogs from fatal fungus infection. Conversely, the professor challenges this idea by saying that this treatment is complicated and expensive. Frogs need to take the treatment by individuals and the treatment also unable to pass on frogs' offsprings. Therefore, it can not put on action in a large scale, and many frogs are still under the threat of fungus infection.
The third solution is to reduce the excessive water use and development. On the contrary, the lecture contradicts this opinion by stating that the main thread of forgs natural habitates is the global warming not the water development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-16 | Anurag96 | 70 | view |
| 2021-08-20 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
| 2020-12-25 | talelaldabous | 76 | view |
| 2020-06-06 | Elhamsarvari | 76 | view |
| 2019-06-26 | Derrick Wang | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e rebutted by the following lecture. The first solution according to the reading...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, however, if, second, so, still, therefore, third, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1188.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 222.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35135135135 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8518601086 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585585585586 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0370142029 49.2860985944 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248496318255 0.272083759551 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773920026467 0.0996497079465 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602774277551 0.0662205650399 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127410367325 0.162205337803 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591175830929 0.0443174109184 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.