The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by day car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030.
The line chart compares the figures for daily passengers who travel by three different forms of transport in the UK from 1970 to 2030.
Overall, the UK commuters prefer using the car to going by bus and train, and bus passengers tend to decrease over 60 years.
Between 1970 and 2015, there was a dramatic increase in the number of car commuters from around 5 to 7 million. In this time, although the figure of bus users was nearly double the number of train passengers which was around 2 million (1970), the figure of bus users reduced slowly to the same number of train commuters which was 3.5 million (2015).
In 2030, car users are expected to grow continuously to reach a peak of 9 million. While the number of train passengers is predicted to climb quickly to nearly 5 million (2030), it is anticipated that the figure of the bus commuters will decrease slightly to the number which is less than three times the number of car users (2030).
- The diagram below shows the water cycle, which is the continuous movement of water on, above and below the surface of the Earth. 73
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of Kolkata. 56
- The tables compare the amount of money of selling coffee and bananas, in two separate years, in five difference EU nations. 67
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 61
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...engers tend to decrease over 60 years. Between 1970 and 2015, there was a drama...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 777.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57058823529 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38191717147 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505882352941 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.7128205661 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.5 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298860324957 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164027403916 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479022677294 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184983981425 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343704413891 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.