We could learn new lessons in classes at a university, school, library or any other institute by means of discussions between students and lectures by teachers. In my opinion, classes with many discussions between students and the professor are more practical since the professor teaches the class dynamically and actively and also I would realize how to think about a subject from different perspectives.
In most classes that include relentless lectures only by the teacher I feel drowsy. As an example, in high school I always found the literature class too boring. My teacher would read the written texts and poems, explain the meaning of them, describe the concepts and talk about the biography of the writers all by herself. I always felt sleepy and I couldn’t concentrate at all so, I had a recorder with myself in that class and I recorded her voice and used them when I wanted to study for the exams. Consequently, although I got a good grade for the literature course as I studied hard for exams, I didn’t learn a lot in these kinds of classes, and I have never been enthusiastic to read more than the materials I was taught according to the syllabus.
On the other hand, in a class which students get involved in the class, there are lots of discussions and students debate about subjects with the instructor, I might see a concept from different facets as everybody has a unique attitude toward something. For instance, in high school in my math courses most of the time teachers asked students to solve the problems and present their solution on the board. So, we got familiar with various methods to think and solve the issues. As another example, in university I had a history course which its professor stimulated students by asking lots of questions which didn’t have a clear answer. As a result, students debated together during the class and they also searched online or read books in the library after the class for getting prepared to present their ideas better for the next sessions. I studied lots of texts for my history class in university about the industrial revolution in Europe and I learned them by heart because I enjoyed them and used my information in the class to discuss with others.
In conclusion, I believe students probably learn practical information during discussions in the classes, while they get bored in classes which don’t include any involvement except the professors. Students wouldn’t acquire any knowledge when they are napping during a teacher’s lecture.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.Use specific reasons and examples to 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 70
- Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 76
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wait until the class or meeting is o 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, so, thus, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2123.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99529411765 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81817531583 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496470588235 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 647.1 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.8631981487 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.533333333 100.406767564 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 20.6045352989 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251689935173 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936134429629 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637857952047 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166820840903 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760880517516 0.0645574589148 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 58.1214874552 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.