The pie charts illustrate the proportion of three age groups of the citizen living in Yemen and Italy in 2000 and prediction of 2050.
Overall, it is clearly seen that the percentage of people with 60 years or more shows upward trend in both countries.
Firstly, the age group of 0-14 years was the highest segment of the pie chart with 50.1% in Yemen in 2000. In this year, people between 15 and 59 years was showed 46.3 %. The lowest percentage of ages group was people with 60 and more years by 3.6 %. On the other hand, it is foreseen that the proportion of group of 15-59 years and elderly people will increase in 57.3 % and 5.7%, respectively in 2050 while group of 0-14 years will decrease nearly 58%.
Secondly, in Italy, just over 60% of population was 15-59 years and the other groups of citizen were 0-14 years by 14,3 % and older population with 60+years by 24.1 % in 2000. Unlike Yemen, the percentage of group of 15-59 years expected that will decrease with 46,2%. Generation of 0-14 years will drop from 14.3% to 11.5%. The proportion of group of 60 ande more ages will have decreased with 42.3% by the same year.
- In your opinion, should young people choose their professions, or should their parents choose for them? 73
- the chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used internet everyday from 2003 2006 86
- The diagram below explains the process of recycling plastic bottles for new uses Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
- In the past, shopping was a routine domestic task. Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby. To what extent do you think this is a positive trend? 73
- IELTS 10 Test 3 Writing task 1 The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, second, secondly, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58128078818 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24512539021 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497536945813 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0004444422 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0814989595432 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492166178726 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610993704239 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0767713702097 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0742268798749 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.88 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.