The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Submitted by nkd2854 on Fri, 07/05/2019 - 00:35

The graph illustrates the goods transportation capacity in the UK among four different modes of transport: road, water, rail, and pipeline. Units are measured in million tonnes.

Overall, there were three out of four types which had a significant increase in the number of goods transiting in the UK between 1974 and 2002 while only the railway remained the same figure the end of the same period.

Beginning with the highest line, in the UK, the quantities of goods which road vehicles could carry inclined gradually from 1974 to around 1994 by 70 to around 80 million tonnes. Similarly, the least in the capacity of goods transported - pipeline had a steady but massive rise from 5 to more than 20 million tonnes in the same period.

Meanwhile, trains and boats, in the UK, were almost at the same capacity for goods at the beginning of the period (1974). However, from 1978, more and more goods had transited by railway. After the sharp climb ended in 1982, the figure remained at the same level (around 60 million) till 2002; whereas, water-transit goods capacity fluctuated around 30 million tonnes from 1978 to 2002

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-21 PsycRicky 56 view
2020-01-16 Raksadil 73 view
2020-01-16 Adilrahi 73 view
2019-12-27 happyhappy 61 view
2019-11-28 bibikulsum 84 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by user nkd2854 :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'goods'' or 'good's'?
Suggestion: goods'; good's
The graph illustrates the goods transportation capacity in the UK among...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...il, and pipeline. Units are measured in million tonnes. Overall, there were three ou...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, similarly, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89528795812 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51854557862 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560209424084 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5916749633 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.875 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203385036436 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961180562989 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908821430966 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149462950169 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0742310236126 0.0819641961636 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.