The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.
The bar chart illustrates data about the variations in term of the average house prices, in between 1990 and 2002 compared with 1989, in New York (USA), Madrid (Spain), Tokyo (Japan), Frankfurt (Germany), and London (UK).
Overall, in five mentioned cities, it is clear that, in the former of 1990 and 2002 period, there was a significant decrease in the average home value which inclined mostly in the latter.
Beginning with the first 5 years (1990-1995) information, in both Tokyo (Japan) and London (UK), the expenses that people had to averagely pay for houses reached the lowest fall (around 7.5%), comparing to three other countries. At the second, the amount of money required to buy a house for New Yorker declined by 5%. Meanwhile, there was a slight increase in the average value of Madrid's and Frankfurt's houses.
In contrast to the figure in between 1996 and 2002, London's percentage change in average home value peaked at nearly 12% while New York's, Madrid's and Frankfurt's rose considerably to 5%, 4%, and 2%, respectively. However, after the drop in the early period, the average house prices in Tokyo continued to decline to 5% between 1996 to 2002.
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Crime and punishment 89
- Many modern children spend a great deal of time sitting in front of a television or computer screen. This is extremely harmful to their development. Therefore Parents should strictly limit the time children spend in this way.To what extent, do you agree o 61
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 961.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90306122449 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50519555917 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622448979592 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.5906632136 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.285714286 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360321400293 0.215688989381 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154939831431 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852182522296 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2087870674 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658264051825 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.