Protection of wild animals is a waste of resources – Wild animals have no place in the 21st century and trying to preserve these animals is wastage of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Preservation of wildlife is considered a waste of resources. While some people believe that we are wasting our resources for the preservation of wildlife as it has no place in 21st century, others maintain that wildlife is necessary for our survival. The essay will discuss why wildlife protection is necessary.
To begin with, protecting wildlife is not a wastage of resources as it is very important part of life. Wildlife helps to maintain our ecosystem which is important for our survival. For example, if there no more animals which eats bugs then the population of bugs will go unchecked and they will wreck havoc on our agricultural products. Therefore, given their pivotal role in ecosystem management use our resource to protect them is good idea.
On the other hand, some people think that wildlife do not belong in 21st century and conserving them is like draining our resources through. They are unaware of the beauty of these animals and their economic value. For instance, many African countries are earning money through wild animal reserves as each of them are unique on their own and many people pay money to see them in their natural habitat.
This essay discussed why wild animals should be saved. In my opinion wild animals are as imperative as we are and people who thinks otherwise are ignorant.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-08 | nevermind123 | 88 | view |
- Many students take part-time jobs while studying in university. Do you think it is a good idea or a bad idea? 55
- Protection of wild animals is a waste of resources Wild animals have no place in the 21st century and trying to preserve these animals is wastage of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 88
- It is sometimes said that borrowing money from a friend can harm or damage the friendship. Do you agree? Why or why not? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer. 62
- When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success. Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position. 55
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication, such as letters, email, or telephone calls. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: WRECK_HAVOC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'wreak havoc'?
Suggestion: wreak havoc
...of bugs will go unchecked and they will wreck havoc on our agricultural products. Therefore...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1105.0 1207.87684729 91% => OK
No of words: 222.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97747747748 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62326579197 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 139.433497537 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563063063063 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4084373315 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0833333333 104.977214359 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.25397266985 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255978425183 0.242375264174 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986952688623 0.0925447433944 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508649726342 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157745556968 0.151781067708 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446612610192 0.0609392437508 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 55.0591133005 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.