The table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011.
The table compares the conversion in the number of inhabitants who went to work by bicycle, in twelve locations in the United Kingdom, from 2001 to 2011.
Overall, the figure of commuters cycling to work rose dramatically in 10 years, and inner London had the highest percentage of changing over the periods.
During this time, in inner London, the number of residents cycling increased significantly from over 43 (2001) to above 106 thousand (2011), and this changing rate was the highest point (144%). By contrast, although outer London had the second-largest number of people who went to work by bicycle in 2001, the proportion change of commuters was only 45% which was the least in 10 years.
The percentage changing, in Brighton with Hove and Bristol, was the second (109%) and the third biggest (94%) over the periods, respectively. Between 2001 and 2011, the number of residents cycling to work in remain eight areas also climbed up, but always below 10 thousand.
- The chart gives information about UK immigration, emigration and net migration between 1999and 2008. 56
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Whycould this be?Should governments give more financial support to local film industries? 67
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. Whatcan governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 61
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 78
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school sitein 2024. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96913580247 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63635175125 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561728395062 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 23.1402727344 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 134.166666667 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342364554905 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171792186793 0.103423049105 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127323305902 0.0843802449381 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199227291492 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609034892074 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.