In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
Nowadays, social media plays substantial rules in our lives, thus, people can easily access up to date news in the minimum of time. Therefore, there is a widely held view among people that reading one news from different sources is not essential. However, I personally subscribe to the view that if people can prove the authenticity of news from diverse references, so people avoid the distribution of fake news in the society, and people can confidently debate about that information, and also during these searches, people will be able to find other useful and interesting news via the internet or newspapers. In-depth discussion on each of the abovementioned reasons is presented below.
First and possibly the most important reason why I believe that people should not promote news and information according to the limited sources is that this news can have disruptive and delibating effects on our society. In fact, when vague news is disturbed in the society by people, absolutely those news weaken bases of the society, and corruption will enhance. My own experience is also a compelling example of this. When sanctions are applied to our country, Iran, people had more attention to social media such as Instagram, unfortunately, most people had decided to profit from this situation. They promote fake news about the increasing price of foreign currency. As a result, this fake information decreased the value of our money. For this reason, I strongly believe that we have to accept only genuine news.
There is a further subtle word we must consider, which is the fact that people can easily be aware of the other news which can be useful and valuable for them. To be more specific, people should not limit their vision about the information because when people find different aspects of information during their search, so this information will enhance their self-confidence and with this simple work, they can improve their personality and, they will choose the best option when they are faced with challenging problems. For instance, my cousin had much more interest in foreign news especially the foreign newspapers, and he could learn the Spanish language from their news. Accordingly, I think that people should spend more time to be aware of the news anywhere in the world.
In a word, by taking all the aforementioned reasons into account we may draw the conclusion that people have to be confident about the authenticity of the news. This is primarily due to the facts that people can confidently speak about that news, and people will be able to find another worthwhile news during their search.
- It is important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends 76
- It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. 60
- it is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject 73
- It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in on specific subject 61
- Some people prefer to live in a small town, others prefer to live in a big city. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 296, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this news' or 'those newses'?
Suggestion: this news; those newses
...ed in the society by people, absolutely those news weaken bases of the society, and corrup...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for instance, i think, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2187.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05080831409 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71661866315 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496535796767 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 679.5 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.3428755918 48.9658058833 180% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.647058824 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4705882353 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94117647059 5.45110844103 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192420062434 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700828399266 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393141507337 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133192227061 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325030601954 0.0645574589148 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.