The pie charts beloww show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
The pie charts illustrate the amount of electricity generated from 5 main fuel resources in two nations over two decades.
It can be clearly seen that the generated units also increased in Australia and France despite the importance of natural gas decreased. Overall, one interesting fact was that the development of nuclear power was only applied in France.
In 1980, the total electricity generation was close with 100 and 90 units for Australia and France, where the largest component came from coal at 50 and 25 units independently. Natural gas was the same vital as coal in France while the contribution was lower with hydro power at 20 units in Australia. As far as the least generated power in Australia and France, there were oil and hydro power at 10 and 5 units separately.
Over 20 years, the overall produced electricity changed dramatically, 170 units were rose in Australia as well as an increase was realized in France by 90 units. Coal was still the biggest power generated source in Australia, where raised to 130 units sharply, although it remained unchanged in France. Also, the generated Hydropower was increased to 36 units in Australia whereas there were just 2 units produced with Natural gas in France. Moreover, Nuclear power became the most popular in France at 126 units suddenly. Lastly, oil and coal were fell to 2 units individually as well as became the least in Australia.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | happyhappy | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | kalampeet | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | kalampeet | 56 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 78
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 69
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008 11
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, lastly, moreover, so, still, well, whereas, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1173.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94936708861 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75153370066 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502109704641 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 370.8 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.8712879428 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.636363636 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245693543947 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105891571261 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422263083832 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151959162359 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415092788334 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.