Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Starting from the age of 6 in grade 1 of K-12 education (in the United States), students and teachers have an ongoing relationship based on the student’s academic performance. This relationship is based on the foundation of teachers providing students grades in some paradigm. This paradigm can include grades such as A-F letter grades, pass/fail, percentages, and so forth. However, the notion that a teacher’s salary should be commensurate with their student’s academic performance is highly suspect. I believe a teacher’s salary should not be dependent on their students’ academic performance. I will next outline three of the reasons why I believe this should not be the case.
To begin, teachers work with students coming from a wide variety of socioeconomic backgrounds. For example, in a poorer public school district, a teacher might be in charge of instructing multiple socioeconomically disadvantaged students throughout most of their K-12 education. Within the framework of teachers’ salaries being based on students’ academic performance within a county, it is hasty to reward a teacher from a more affluent area more than a teacher from a poorer area. Students from the poorer area are more than likely to not perform as highly on a standardized academic level compared to their richer counterparts.
Furthermore, it is not always a teacher’s choosing with regards to which location they will teach in. These assignments are often made by another concerned party, leaving a teacher’s salary dependent on the current job openings at the time of their application and the caliber of students in the region they will teach. This idea illustrates how unfair it is to have a teacher’s salary be dependent on their students’ academic performance.
Thirdly, the mark of a ‘good’ teacher cannot always be adequately judged by the academic successes of their students. Particularly in K-12 education, where much of the students prefrontal cortexes are not even close to being fully developed, focusing on arcane academic subjects provides little immediate value, thus their objective academic performance suffers. Teachers should not be penalized for this normal physiologic developmental process that all humans share during this timeline. It is possible that the more important things being taught to these students are positive humanistic traits and morality judgments that they will utilize for the rest of their lives, yet the teacher will never be monetarily rewarded these concepts under this paradigm.
In conclusion, basing a teacher’s salary on their students’ academic performance is an inherently bad idea. Suppose this paradigm was utilized and it was found that teachers from the most affluent areas of the county were earning the most money. There would clearly be a discriminatory link between different socioeconomic levels and monetary reward of teachers. Thus, teachers’ salaries should remain constant throughout the county and not be based on the academic performance of their students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-09 | harshit kukreja | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | sagar2052 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | sagar2052 | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Persian Moonlight | 83 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | Akhil_Maddukuri | 50 | view |
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most co 66
- The vice president of human resources at Climpson Industries sent the following recommendation to the company's president."In an effort to improve our employees' productivity, we should implement electronic monitoring of employees' Int 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Starting from the age of 6 in grade 1 of...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...believe this should not be the case. To begin, teachers work with students co...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ompared to their richer counterparts. Furthermore, it is not always a tea...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... students' academic performance. Thirdly, the mark of a 'good&a...
^^^
Line 7, column 27, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ormance. Thirdly, the mark of a 'good' teacher cannot always ...
^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed these concepts under this paradigm. In conclusion, basing a teacher&apo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, third, thirdly, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2638.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 469.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62473347548 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31445487005 2.79657885939 119% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490405117271 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 813.6 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0848744649 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.619047619 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271483679167 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109813790072 0.0831039109588 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570377481389 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185037268387 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231888045333 0.0667264976115 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.1639044944 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.