All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
I completely agree with the issue at hand. There's a big demand and huge dollar for consultant firms with the sole purpose of suggesting ways for the company to operate more efficiently. this is totally counterintuitive given the fact that its own employees would have much more credibility when it comes to determining the company's efficiency.
Adding insult to injury, most employees tend to resign from such firms at quite early stages in their career, most fresh recruits resigning under the 2 year mark. this alone should be a huge telltale sign of how inefficiently these companies function. By my reckoning, this could very well be attributed to the fact that many multi-billion dollar companies often neglect their own employees, which is not only frustrating for the employee, but also costs the company top dollar to get outside suggestions, which could be considered average to say the least.
After all, who would know better? An employee who works 8 to 9 hours a day, 5 days a week in the company or a consulting firm trying to impress its employer with some fascinating revelations. In my honest opinion, many multi-billion profit orientated companies can save a lot of money by listening to their own employees and would function even more coherently if they truly try to make their employees happy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | Arpit Sahni | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | shamitha | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | caseya5 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Siddiqur Rahman | 50 | view |
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 33
- Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.Write a res 75
- Every individual in society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust ones. 50
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. 62
- The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for th 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 44, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: There's
...ompletely agree with the issue at hand. Theres a big demand and huge dollar for consul...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...he company to operate more efficiently. this is totally counterintuitive given the f...
^^^^
Line 4, column 164, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...cruits resigning under the 2 year mark. this alone should be a huge telltale sign o...
^^^^
Line 4, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2 year mark. this alone should be a huge telltale sign of how inefficiently these...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, after all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 19.5258426966 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 58.6224719101 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1104.0 2235.4752809 49% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 220.0 442.535393258 50% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01818181818 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.55969084622 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8886211644 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.677272727273 0.4932671777 137% => OK
syllable_count: 333.0 704.065955056 47% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.0408846145 60.3974514979 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.666666667 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372182918014 0.243740707755 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130893194406 0.0831039109588 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0936445675874 0.0758088955206 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239420604684 0.150359130593 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504515808982 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 100.480337079 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.