It is often argued that one of the most crucial domain at school is History whereas some experts reckon that Science and Technology becomes more considerable than History in modern society. This essay will discuss both viewpoint and express my opinion.
To begin with, History is not helpful for graduates nowadays. Though pupils may learn more about some historical incidents, such as the cruel memories about world war, students can avoid making a mistake like the ancient losers, it is not practical for students compared with Science & Technology since they are not helped to obtain a high-quality work from History, which cannot teach any realistic skills for pupils like communication skills. Thus, the importance of History may not larger than Science & Technology as the reason of unpractical while it can still become a compulsory domain in campus.
On the other hand, Science & Technology subject is able to let students train a logical thinking through treating a number of formula on the lecture as well as help them to be a scientist or engineer in the future, which is a spectacular achievement for pupils. Also, it is difficult to understand the principle of this domain as far as students have to learn it via self-studying. For instance, the complicated calculating part is not possible to know it completely in a short period, in contrast, everyone is available to study a history on the internet any time and it is easily to discover. So, compared with History, the subject of Science & Technology is more vital to train on the lesson.
In conclusion, because it is hard to self-study and the merits of ScienceIt is often argued that one of the most crucial domain at school is History whereas some experts reckon that Science and Technology becomes more considerable than History in modern society. This essay will discuss both viewpoint and express my opinion.
To begin with, History is not helpful for graduates nowadays. Though pupils may learn more about some historical incidents, such as the cruel memories about world war, students can avoid making a mistake like the ancient losers, it is not practical for students compared with Science & Technology since they are not helped to obtain a high-quality work from History, which cannot teach any realistic skills for pupils like communication skills. Thus, the importance of History may not larger than Science & Technology as the reason of unpractical while it can still become a compulsory domain in campus.
On the other hand, Science & Technology subject is able to let students train a logical thinking through treating a number of formula on the lecture as well as help them to be a scientist or engineer in the future, which is a spectacular achievement for pupils. Also, it is difficult to understand the principle of this domain as far as students have to learn it via self-studying. For instance, the complicated calculating part is impossible to know the principle completely in a short period, in contrast, everyone is available to study a history on the internet any time and it is easily to discover. So, compared with History, the subject of Science & Technology is more vital to train on the lesson.
In conclusion, because it is hard to self-study and the merits of Science & Technology certainly outweigh to History, I strongly believe that Science & Technology is the most important domain in modern world.
& Technology certainly outweigh to History, I strongly believe that Science & Technology is the most important domain in modern world.
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls In the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008 11
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 61
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, still, thus, well, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 13.1623246493 228% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 82.0 41.998997996 195% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2957.0 1615.20841683 183% => OK
No of words: 579.0 315.596192385 183% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10708117444 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90534594407 4.20363070211 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84800175108 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.284974093264 0.561755894193 51% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 925.2 506.74238477 183% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.9512376158 49.4020404114 194% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.85 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.95 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.38176352705 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278729709656 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105432502733 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703428693497 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17797597542 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478171007121 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.99 8.58950901804 81% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.