the bar chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the U.K from 2001 to 2008.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of U.K population consuming five parts of fruit and vegetable daily between 2001 and 2008.
Overall, it can be seen that, over the period as a whole, the number of people having such a diet had increased. Moreover, it was also noticed that the women under this category out numbered men and children.
At the beginning of the period, the percentage of female stood at just above 20, which was almost double the amount of children in that year. Following that, their proportion gradually increased, hitting a peak in 2006, accounting for over 30%, it then tapered off a little by the end of the period still being at the top of the other groups.
Children on the other hand, remained the lowest population falling under such category, starting at a little above 10%, it remained stable for the next few years after which its percentage rose steadily reaching a high of around 25% in the year 2007, ending the time frame in 2008 at a little less than 25%, being the least of that year. In addition, the graph of men followed a similar pattern, however it stood second throughout the years.
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the U.K from 2001 to 2008. 78
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the U.K from 2001 to 2008. 78
- The line graph below shows the consumption of 4 kinds of meat in a European Country from 1979 to 2004 66
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makecomparisons w 11
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity: 2010 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: K
...r chart illustrates the proportion of U.K population consuming five parts of frui...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, moreover, second, so, still, then, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72864321608 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41723690747 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628140703518 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.2003401353 43.030603864 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.428571429 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4285714286 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4285714286 5.23603664747 218% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10371547597 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559210445313 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0993280381398 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920128761075 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118173773325 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.