The line graph below shows the consumption of 4 kinds of meat in a European Country from 1979 to 2004.
The line graph illustrates the weekly intake of four different types of meat, namely chicken, beef, lamb and fish, between 1979 and 2004.
Overall, the consumption of chicken increased steadily, while that of beef and lamb decreased. Furthermore, great fluctuations were observed in the usage of beef, while fish intake stayed relatively unchanged.
The demand of chicken consumption at the beginning of the period was a little less than 150 grams per person per week and continued to rise. Eventually, in 1989, it exceeded the amount of beef consumed, before hitting a peak of around 250 in 2004. Lamb consumption, at the start of the recorded period, stood at a very similar value as that of chicken, but in contrast, it’s demand continued to fall, until it reached a low of about 50 in 2004.
Beef consumption was at a little above 200 grams in the year 1979 and this dropped dramatically in the upcoming few years to around 160, before reaching a high of around 250 in 1984. It remained stable for a stretch of few years and subsequently fell to approximately 50 in 2004. Consumption of fish remained at around 50 for the entire period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-07 | akashdhingra | view | |
| 2019-07-20 | Tash | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-14 | jaspreet2110 | 73 | view |
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makecomparisons where relevant. 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity: 2010 67
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the U.K from 2001 to 2008. 78
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the U.K from 2001 to 2008. 78
- the line graph below shows the consumption of four kinds of meat in a European Country from 1979 to 2004 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8730964467 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77340450115 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548223350254 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3521462563 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.666666667 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134039560458 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589008894919 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575674783248 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943342482661 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717426285383 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.