The table below gives information on households with a regular use of car in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007.
Write a report for a lecturer describing the information shown below. Make comparisons where relevant.
The graph shows the change in number of car each household used in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007.
Overall, the use of car in Britain to period of 36 years increased smoothly. In particular, the number of households without car fell while the number of households with two cars rose significantly.
In 1971, beginning of the period, almost half of all households did not have any car. Around 45% of households owned one car, but only very small number, about 7% had two cars. It was uncommon for a household to use three or more cars since just 2% falling into this category.
The one-car ownership is the most popular trend of households in many years of 1970s. This number remains stability around 45%. There was also little change in the category three-or-more-car households, which the number grown slightly from 2% to 7% in the period of 36 years. There was a rapid rise in the number of households which have 2 cars, reaching about 26% in 2007. And the biggest change was seen in the figures of households without a car, which fell steadily to 25% in the last year of period.
- The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008 59
- The graph shows changes of amount and type of fast food consumed by teenagers in Australia from 1975 to 2000. 73
- In recent years there has been growing interest in relationship between equality and personal achievement Some people believe that individuals can achieve more in egalitarian societies Others believe that high level of personal achievement are possible on 82
- Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world people share the same fashions, advertising, brands, eating habits, and TV channels.Do the disadvantages of this trend outweigh the advantages? 67
- The graph illustrates the amount of spreads consumed from 1981 to 2007. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63402061856 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58414045883 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567010309278 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.1128648065 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.7272727273 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6363636364 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54545454545 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187189625253 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871548420242 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064985648294 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15912349624 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659196436357 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.