The graph shows the average annual expenditure on cell phone and residential phone services.
The line graph compares average spending on landline phones and cell phones of American consumers from 2001 to 2010.
Overall, it is clear that the average expenditures on landline phone services fell significantly over 10-year period, while the figures of mobile phone services rose rapidly. The year 2006 marks the point at which spending of mobile phone services overtook that of residential phone services.
In 2001, the US consumers spent average of $200 on mobile phones, compared to nearly $700 on residential phones that threefold with cellphones' figure. Over the following five years, average annually spending on landline phone services dropped by nearly $200, while the expenditure on mobile rose sharply by $300 approximately.
In the year 2006 the average American paid out the same amount of money on both types of phone services, which spent over $500 on each. By 2010, the figure for residential phones had fallen to just half of this amount.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 803.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18064516129 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.622911934 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.309963338 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.714285714 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.28571428571 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431742866478 0.215688989381 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.216868217217 0.103423049105 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652147550414 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276062137254 0.15604864568 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535870437119 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.