If people want to contribute to the society, which of the following is the best way?
1. riding bicycle or walking on foot
2. recycling the waste
3. buying local organic food
In the contemporary world contributing to the wellbeing of society is a prominent hallmark of modern societies. It is a duty for the citizens to participate in the social affair of that community and try to heighten the life standards. There has been a long debate among scholars about the best way to help the society’s development. As far as I am concerned, I believe that recycling the waste is the best way to help a community elevate its citizens’ lifestyle. In what follows two elaborate reasons will vindicate my point of view.
The first vital point to bear in mind is that recycling the waste is the best way to preserve the environment. Different kinds of waste is disseminated around the habitat and non-habitat zones and it will have a harmful influence on flora and fauna. The waste material have polluted the oceans and seas and other kinds are left in the nature by different groups of people. Some of this waste take up to a thousand years to decompose. A recent study which is done by a group of scientists in New York institute of nature preservation has found that the garbage which is produced by tourists in many beach areas are pulled backed to the sea and the different types of life in the water are feeding on this garbage and once this life forms are entered into the human food chain, it will cause different types of diseases.
The second noteworthy reason to mention is that recycling used material is much more economic than producing new materials. Producing new material demands numerous resources which need man power, money and a lot of time and energy. While producing new material from scratch is a common way of production lines, academics found out that using the waste material is a more effective and hence a rational way to make new stuff since they just melt and remake the commodity. Certain material like Plastics, paper and metal waste are a good example of this. Societies can improve the infrastructure to retain the used material from the members and put it into practice in the factories. Take a personal experience as an example. A professor of mine were restating his experience in a paper production factory. He maintained that when the production line was working on raw material to make new paper, it took a lot of time and resources to produce new paper like the water, tree supply and etc which could benefit people elsewhere but it was wasting. When they shifted their supply line to the used paper, they found out that they can make the paper twice effective and in half expense.
To bring everything into conclusion I believe that recycling waste is the best way to contribute the society because it helps to preserve the environment and it is much more economic than making via new material. I recommend everyone to separate their waste when they are made and deliver it to the authorities to complete the recycling process.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-16 | r.mahdavi70@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Overall, the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today's world." Use reasons and details to support your opinion. 3
- People learn things better from those at their own level - such as fellow students or coworkers - than from those at a higher level, such as teacher or supervisors. There are probably a lot of people who agree with the idea which people learn things bette 73
- If people want to contribute to the society, which of the following is the best way?1. riding bicycle or walking on foot2. recycling the waste3. buying local organic food 73
- At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago, there was a mass-extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species. It was this extinction event that allowed dinosaurs to become the dominant species for the next 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 895, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rking on raw material to make new paper, it took a lot of time and resources to p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, second, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2399.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 503.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76938369781 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70278457976 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485089463221 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 785.7 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.9399154637 48.9658058833 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.238095238 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9523809524 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.19047619048 5.45110844103 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115571295768 0.236089414692 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.034334234813 0.076458572812 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380846103052 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0806984546608 0.150856017488 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284194554259 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.