It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Exploring different parts of the world has always been an imports aspect in terms of scientists as well as governments. Travelling to extreme ends of the earth for experts and travellers is feasible in today’s world as the South Pole. In my opinion, this step explores the opportunities for a better life in many ways and has a wide variety of advantages to humankind.
Firstly, travelling to remote areas where humans have never lived before expanding the possibilities of living there. With the increase in population around the world, the earth is getting smaller and smaller every day, therefore the demand for more land is high to provide the habitat for the growing population. For instance, urban regions of Mumbai, India, are getting polluted and constrain with the rise in the number of residences each year. Hence, the allocation of these people to another land is a big reason to worry for the government.
Secondly, possibilities of natural resources are high in remote areas like the South Pole because of zero habitats on such lands, therefore travelling to such places is a major relief for the scientific community in terms of providing better utilities to the people. For instance, recently it has been revealed by geological experts that extreme poles of earth carry ampule amount of fresh water, and this can benefit humans in terms of providing drinking water for 100 years. However, extreme environmental conditions of such regions can make living possibilities difficult, as humans acceptable range of living is in moderate temperature zone.
In conclusion, the hot and cold temperature can be a challenge for humans to survive in remote regions. Although, the benefits mentioned above outweigh the disadvantages of travelling to remote regions of the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-17 | b.yousefi | 89 | view |
| 2019-09-29 | astrlw@hotmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-20 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-20 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 67
- Some people believe that not all criminals should be kept in prison, but some of them should be allowed to do unpaid work to help the community. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Doctors nurses and teachers make a great contribution to society and should be paid more than entertainment and sports celebrities To what extent do you agree 81
- With the development of online communication, people will never be alone and will always be able to make new friends. To what extent do you agree? 73
- A friend is expecting you to stay with him in two weeks time, but unfortunately you forgot that you have a business trip at the same time.Write letter to friend-apologise and say that you cannot come to visit-explain why you will not able to visit-suggest 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'imports'' or 'import's'?
Suggestion: imports'; import's
...t parts of the world has always been an imports aspect in terms of scientists as well a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 522, Rule ID: WORRY_FOR[1]
Message: The verb 'worry' does not normally take the preposition 'for'. Did you mean 'worry about'?
Suggestion: worry about
...ople to another land is a big reason to worry for the government. Secondly, possibilit...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...or humans to survive in remote regions. Although, the benefits mentioned above outweigh ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21799307958 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88216808622 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557093425606 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3616894858 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.666666667 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306140024867 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101171664997 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643092206747 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174423214537 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488786376073 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.