Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair.
Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion.
An important subject of doing certain job is how professional get remunerated of the job they have done. A professional athlete usually gets a greater deal when winning a league. This would lead to some point of views regarding the deal of money whether it is fully justified or it is unfair if it is compared to other important job.
A great deal of money from winning a competition the professional athlete had been done is clearly a prize of their hardships. The prize is considered as a reward for taking a part in national or regional pride. Subsequently, the athletes possess positive values such as disciplines, persistency, and consistencies to keep on training in order to reach the top. That would be an impactful example for the others. In addition, some people may think this priceless influence could inspire future generations, and great deal of money shall be taken into account because of this.
In contrary, being professional athlete is considered overpaid since there are more important job's salary which are relatively far from the athlete's prize. This idea is occurred because many jobs that considered as more technically and directly involved in society and civilization development are being underpaid. Therefore, some people will say it is unfair for athlete to get a greater deal.
Both point of views offer their explanation towards professional athlete’s reward whether it is justified or just unfair. However, if we take a deeper concern, the prize the athlete got is paid for their hardship and inspirations, which actually impactful for our societies. Owing to this, a great deal of money rewarded to athletes is worth their efforts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | happyhappy | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Sadrarouhi | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | morbymuku | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | ngannguyen | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | WIWI UMAR | 61 | view |
- The chart below shows estimated world literacy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.You should write at least 150 words. 78
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The bar graph shows net national income (that's the income earned by the various factors of production in the economy, after the loss of used-up capital equipment has been accounted for) in per capita terms. 11
- The chart below shows estimated world literacy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.You should write at least 150 words. 56
- he chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 335, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it is compared to other important job. A great deal of money from winning a com...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1496350365 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95407014967 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554744525547 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1646227436 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.785714286 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233814627991 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837340721048 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821282380766 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145387657079 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377087571437 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.