The line graph illustrates the average CO2 emissions on average per person in four different countries from 1967 to 2007. Units are measured in metric tonnes. The CO2 emissions of the Italy and Portugal showed a steady but significant rise over the period, while the remaining two experienced a downward trend.
In 1967, the CO2 emissions of the Italy and Portugal were nearly 4.5 metric tonnes and 1 metric tonnes respectively. The CO2 emissions of Italy was increased sharply through out the period and remains constant from 1997 to 2007. Furthermore, it exceeds the amount of CO2 emissions of Sweden in 1990 and reached almost 7.5 metric tonnes at the end of the period. In the mean time, the CO2 emissions in the Portugal grew to 3 metric tonnes in 1997, and experienced a rapid surge to more than 5 metric tonnes and continued with slightly increase to 5.2 metric tonnes in 2007.
The amount of CO2 emissions of Sweden reached its peak at 10.5 metric tonnes in 1997 and began from 9 metric tonnes in 1967 and declined to 5 metric tonnes in 2007. The CO2 emissions of UK(11 metric tonnes) was the highest among these four countries. However, it dramatically declined to 8.5 metric tonnes in 2007.
In conclusion, it is clear that the UK produced the largest amount of gas while Sweden and Portugal were jointly produce the lowest amount of gas.
- IELTS WRITING TASK 1: PIE CHARTS 11
- IELTS WRITING TASK 1 PIE CHARTS 66
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...missions of Italy was increased sharply through out the period and remains constant from 19...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'produced'.
Suggestion: produced
... while Sweden and Portugal were jointly produce the lowest amount of gas.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1121.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77021276596 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51925675445 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468085106383 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2931728362 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.909090909 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197692076507 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999838203322 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637653817181 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141175214208 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0936748523488 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.