When families have a meal together it is considered social activity. Do you think eating together is important to people in your country?
There is a controversial issue about the importance of family dining. In Kazakhstan, some grandparents state that it enables to strengthen family ties, while some economists claim that it has become an outdated tradition. In this essay, I will consider both points of view as well as agree with the idea of significance of eating in the family circle.
Let us start with reasons why some grandparents argue that family meals play an important role in developing a strong relationship. The first reason is that it usually helps to smooth quarrels in households. Many family members stop talking to each other for a long because of disagreements, but with the help of family dining, they can restore a close connection. Another reason is that growing members of family learn both traditions and customs on such occasions. Many older members of family can pass the culture to the juniors sitting around the table, so that the national entity continues to exist in society.
However, some economists believe that this kind of family gatherings no longer carry any significance. They justify their opinion with the following arguments. Firstly, eating together with family is highly wasteful. Many families spend much money on seemingly family-strengthening occasions, which create large holes in the budget, but it would be better to avoid such expenditure on these occasions. Secondly, globalization is gradually eliminating the need of family dining. Global culture are successfully replacing different traditions with its common ones, so eating together is becoming less essential and influential as a tool of cultural exchange.
In conclusion, even though some economists advocate that home gatherings around the table are becoming unimportant, I think that they still keep its vital role in reinforcing family bonds for the above mentioned reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-15 | bhatvishal@ | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-30 | Tolik | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-30 | Tolik | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-30 | Tolik | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-31 | writetozil | 84 | view |
- Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed, while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change.Discuss both and give your opinion. 84
- Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of living and working in a foreign country. 61
- You have received a letter from your bank, asking you to acknowledge receipt of a new bank card. However, the card was missing from the envelope.Write a letter to the bank's head office. In your letter:explain why you are writingexpress concern about 78
- Some people choose to eat no meat or fish. They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole.Discuss this view and give your own opinion. 84
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries, many small, local businesses are unable to compete. Some people think that the closure of local business bring about the death of local communities.To what extent do you agree o 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ay, I will consider both points of view as well as agree with the idea of significance of ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, well, while, i think, in conclusion, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3883161512 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99824978567 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611683848797 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1390770049 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.533333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168610310007 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608249592356 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516851356349 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981030256246 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035507185168 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.