In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
It is said that a novice more than a skilled person makes important contributions in different fields. I agree with this statement to some extent.
On the one hand, it is understandable why it is believed that the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions. Firstly, when the beginners are employed in a new workplace, they tend to prove themselves to their colleagues and boss. They are eager to make an important impact. Therefore, they try to work hard and contribute to different fields. They attempt to show that they are active and can cope with the challenges in the work. Secondly, most of the time, new staff are employed because the manager of a company tends to have new workforces with updated knowledge and innovation to keep up with the rivals in the competitive market. The beginners have a fresh mind, and they are less likely to avoid challenging ideas or constructive attempts. Also, the beginners are expected to make contributions based on their relevant knowledge and abilities. Additionally, most of the time, the novices have more contributions because of the newness of the subject to them. This makes them more passionate to contribute more compared to others.
On the other hand, I believe that a beginner cannot have more contributions to making important decisions because they are not as skillful as those who have years of work experience. The contribution of experts in making decisions has more advantages than beginners. The person who works on a specific job for years is undoubtedly more reliable than a beginner who is taking the work recently. Experts with their experience and empirical knowledge can determine what works and what does not work. This is the difference between an expert and a beginner. For example, in the hospital in emergencies, the experienced doctor can make a quick and important decision based on his or her experiences but the fledgling interns only can apply the instructions and standard treatments that they have learned from the books. Therefore, in this case, the beginners can not make an important contribution, and they only have a facilitator role.
To summarize, in my view both experts and beginners try to contribute significantly to their chosen fields, and each one has his/ her contribution to the success of an inquiry. The role of none of them should be ignored. Experts with their experience and empirical knowledge, and the beginners with their new and updated knowledge can make a good group for the success of their common work. In addition to this, the contribution of either a beginner or an expert depends on the goals that they hope to achieve in their chosen fields.
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries 75
- According to a recent report, cheating among college and university students is on the rise. However, Groveton College has successfully reduced student cheating by adopting an honor code, which calls for students to agree not to cheat in their academic en 25
- In any profession—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years. The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 66
- Claim It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Reason The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished 74
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2242.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 449.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99331848552 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91781396343 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.429844097996 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 704.7 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.9950288267 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4782608696 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5217391304 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17391304348 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303665351798 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107180881308 0.0831039109588 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111016069765 0.0758088955206 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197163954569 0.150359130593 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454681808039 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.