Governments should place few, if any, restriction on scientific research and development
Scientific research development is a sector which contribute towards the welfare of the nation. Author’s claim “Governments should place few, if any, restriction on scientific research and development”, in my opinion, is valid as imparting restriction on scientific research and development might hinder scientists in coming up with something novel that can really improve the living conditions of people of the nation. Following are the reasons for my accordance with the author.
Firstly, Research is sector which require interest and passion and without this ingredients, the research work might not turn out fruitful as anticipated. Thus, restricting scientists in carrying out research work might actually break down their morals. Instead, government should bolster research work carried out by scientists as today’s most of the elements contributing to better life are the milestones achieved by many scientists in their research works. Consider an example, would traveling long distance would be easy if automobiles were not their in scenario? would one able to construe world around them, if scientists through their work have not unleashed truths? Thus above questions aptly specifies the importance of scientific research and development and placing restrictions might hobble scientists in enlightening the people or providing leisure life to people.
Secondly, If government places the restriction on the scientific research and development so that research work carried out by scientist can be useful in solving the problems of the society, would such restriction will really result in solution? In my opinion, research require interest and passion and enforcing scientists to work in field not of their interest might not result in coming up with best solution. Thus, government instead of confining the field of work, should allow scientists to work in any field. Each and every research holds some worth. On what basis one can state that particular research work is of no use. Every research work carried out have indirect impact in contribution.
However, There are some cases in which scientist might require permission of government. For example, when carrying out research related to radioactive material, which have invidious effect on the life’s of people scientist should approve the research work as failure of research might cost a nation very high. In other cases also like leakage in some acids, mishandling of radioactive resources might cost life's. Thus, government should place some restrictions on such experiments carried out.
On wrapping up, Research work require hard-work, passion and interest, thus restricting the research work and development might result in stopping novel and useful innovations, discoveries to exits. However, While carrying out researches which can cost the life's of people if not handled properly government should put some restriction on such researches like location of experiment, equipment used, etc.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-19 | Celestina Asantewaa | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 75 | view |
| 2024-07-01 | MMoksha | 66 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
- Popular events like the football World Cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way 73
- Although innovations such as video, computers, and the internet seem to offer schools improved method for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning 66
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. 66
- All to often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary 66
- To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...equire interest and passion and without this ingredients, the research work might no...
^^^^
Line 3, column 494, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'travel'
Suggestion: travel
...earch works. Consider an example, would traveling long distance would be easy if automobi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 575, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Would
...automobiles were not their in scenario? would one able to construe world around them,...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 681, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...h their work have not unleashed truths? Thus above questions aptly specifies the imp...
^^^^
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the best'.
Suggestion: with the best
... interest might not result in coming up with best solution. Thus, government instead of c...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, thus, while, as to, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 12.9106741573 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2551.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 450.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66888888889 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00610489948 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462222222222 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 735.3 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.4396756181 60.3974514979 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.476190476 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383136643129 0.243740707755 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126561960339 0.0831039109588 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123256500342 0.0758088955206 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264420262627 0.150359130593 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0995120784579 0.0667264976115 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.1639044944 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.