The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.
Author’s claim “The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things” is little contentious claim as author have overlooked that most of the scientific breakthrough’s departs from the interest in common place things, however, through passionate interest in commonplace things, people may come up with more novel ideas in order to bring improvement in society. Some reasons for my accordance with the author are as follows.
Firstly, Consider an example of “Facebook”, Mark Zuckerberg have come up with such concept so that his peers can communicate with each other, this idea arouse from his campus to surmount the need of people to stay connected. Currently, almost every person is using Facebook to connect with each other, instead Facebook is considered as one of the best social media where people can connect with each other. Thus, above example states us how passionate interest in commonplace things can result in coming up with “best” ideas.
Secondly, People having passionate interest in commonplace things actually improve the life condition of people. we have many inventions at our disposition which explicate how interests in banal things have resulted in making a human life easy. Consider an example of wheel, people were facing lot of difficulty in transmuting heavy goods over long distances and such problem resulted in use of wheels to carry heavy loads from one place to other. Wheels were already there in the scenario but were only used for pottery purpose, later wheels usage were expanded to carrying goods, etc. People are too much concerned about warding off their difficulties, thus passion towards overcoming their day-to-day difficulties may result in origination of “best” ideas.
However, Considering scientific breakthroughs, one can discord the claim made by author as most of the scientific breakthroughs, which have contributed a lot in improving the living conditions of Peoples is not because of passionate interest in commonplace things instead because of scientists works in different and new fields. Consider an example, many scientists are working towards finding relation between quantum theory and theory of relativity, such notion does not go with interest in common place things. Many discoveries in medicines are made are not the result of passionate interest in commonplace things like introduction of chemotherapy for treating CANCER or new treatment for curing AIDS. However, such ideas have proved to be boon for people as it contribute towards improving human’s lives.
On wrapping up, passion is important factor resulting into origination of “best” ideas where subject is just a secondary matter. Many discoveries or inventions are results of passion of people towards their notions. Thus, confining best ideas resulting for passionate interest in just common place things is vague.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...y improve the life condition of people. we have many inventions at our disposition...
^^
Line 7, column 815, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e towards improving human's lives. On wrapping up, passion is important fac...
^^^
Line 8, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ant factor resulting into origination of 'best' ideas where subject is ...
^^
Line 8, column 234, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'confining the best'.
Suggestion: confining the best
... of people towards their notions. Thus, confining best ideas resulting for passionate interest...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2486.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 445.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58651685393 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11145486385 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512359550562 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 772.2 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.4541914833 60.3974514979 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.235294118 118.986275619 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1764705882 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76470588235 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330201065621 0.243740707755 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111115224516 0.0831039109588 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112001558456 0.0758088955206 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215401804199 0.150359130593 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112175820626 0.0667264976115 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 14.1392134831 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.1639044944 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.