As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing.
What factors contribute to job satisfaction?
How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers?
Career contentment is a vital component of personal happiness and this is because majority of individuals fill a large percentage of their adulthood with work.
Quite a number of reasons contribute to this, which includes but are not limited to benefits such as salary, insurance, trainings and work environment. Despite all the aforementioned, job fulfilment as expected by all employees highly differs, and this, I believe, could be based on factors like qualification, connections or even luck.
Benefits pertaining to the welfare of a worker and a conducive work space, among other things, are essential to every employee's gratification. Incentives such as a good salary, extensive medical insurance, housing allowance and a well organised office usually go a long way in determining how satisfied and contented a staff will be. For instance, my uncle, Thompson Clark, while giving his retirement speech at the annual PEP party which I attended said, "I spent the last twenty-five years of my life working for PEP because of the amazing health care plan it offered my family". This statement, undoubtedly, expresses his joy and reasons for the unwavering commitment.
Everyone, however, cannot get a satisfactory job as the desires of every employee regarding career fulfilment varies from one person to the other. The qualification of a particular staff or the connection in which a worker employed in getting a job completely differs. For some, it could even be luck. Whatever the reasons might be, it will be subjective. In a recent survey on Tesco staff satisfaction by Emily Friar of the BBC news, 70% of workers attributed their job satisfaction to salaries, while medical plan, trainings and housing took the remaining 30%. When we remember individual differences, then there will be a realization that job gratification for all will be dependent on factors considered important by such people.
Conclusively, even though salaries, good medical plan and conducive environment contribute to employee's gratification, all however, is dependent on the person's persona and his views on what a great job should be.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-28 | Nguyen Thuy Trang | 89 | view |
- School and university students learn lesson far better from their teachers than from other source, such as internet and television. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 56
- Many elderly people are not looked after by their families but are put in a care or nursing homes. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this tread 67
- It is often said that to become a successful businessman a tertiary education is not all necessary To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your opinion with relevant examples 83
- Many elderly people are are no long looked after by their families but are put in care homes or nursing homes. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 73
- In order to study at university students are required to pay expensive tuition fees. Not all students can afford them so some people think that university education should be free for everyone. To what extent do you agree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 119, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...ng other things, are essential to every employees gratification. Incentives such as a goo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 153, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ation, all however, is dependent on the persons persona and his views on what a great j...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, so, then, well, while, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1804.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36904761905 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1660344428 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592261904762 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.540930871 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.857142857 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251629807161 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759091033682 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557819912223 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124973613183 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565766796702 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.