TPO 32
The lecturer and the reading discuss some strange sound that hearing in the North Atlantic and the Arctic Ocean which named quackers. Although the passage claims that the quackers made with several sources like ocra whales, giant squid and military submarines, the speaker refutes these ideas through several reasons which I will describe in this reporter.
First and foremost, the passage points out that female ocra whale makes some sound like a quacker to attract a male orca whale, and this sound was make by ocra whale. The lecturer, in contrast, rejects by claiming that it is true that an ocra whale makes the sound to attract the other whale, but they make a sound near-surface of an ocean. Also, if they make a sound at the deep ocean, the human could not be hearing the sound. Thus, it is highly unlikely that the sound could be heard from this far distance, and she also adds that orcas could be detected by submarines' sonar.
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states that giant squid makes this sound, the professor argues that this sound was detected in the 1960s until the 1980s, an suddenly sound was disappeared, but the giant squids always were lived in the ocean. Therefore, the giant could not possibly reason for this sound.
Finally, although the reading passage says that quackers might have been the stray sounds from another country's submarines that were secretly patrolling the area, the speaker disagrees by mentioning that due to the reports the source of the sounds was moving around and changing direction so fast that is impossible for a submarine. Additionally, she said that if there were any other submarines near them, Russian's submarine crew could hear the noise of the engines of those submarines because we do not have the technology to build submarines with such a quiet engine.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-15 | Mamalhastam | 85 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 408, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... at the deep ocean, the human could not be hearing the sound. Thus, it is highly unlikely ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 562, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'submarines'' or 'submarine's'?
Suggestion: submarines'; submarine's
...so adds that orcas could be detected by submarines sonar. Furthermore, unlike the pas...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... detected in the 1960s until the 1980s, an suddenly sound was disappeared, but the...
^^
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('suddenly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('sound') instead of another adjective.
... detected in the 1960s until the 1980s, an suddenly sound was disappeared, but the giant squids a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, in contrast, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 308.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97402597403 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34179828925 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535714285714 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.5425371934 49.2860985944 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.2 110.228320801 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8 21.698381199 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.463115251243 0.272083759551 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185368390945 0.0996497079465 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671387259838 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262523196653 0.162205337803 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0968863765434 0.0443174109184 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.3589403974 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 53.8541721854 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.