Education is the most powerful tool to change the world. I feel that education plays a very important role in making an individual grow personally, socially and economically. Education injects good values to a person. Education gives tools and awareness to the people so that they can earn their daily bread butter and provide better living standards for their family and themselves. I feel quality of education is an essential factor for quality of youth in one country. But I don't feel spending money on education of young children aged 5-10 years will help in the development of country instead government should spend money on universities.
The foremost reason why I disagree with the statement lies in the fact that children at this age are not that developed to bear and understand high level of education. They are meant to enjoy their childhood and learn the basic stuff. Putting lot of pressure at the early stage might disencourage the children and they would end up escaping from studies. High level education will help only when children understands the need of education which they will realize once they grow up.
Second point which provokes me to disagree with the statement is that, government should spend money on university, which will ensure good education to the youth of the country who are considered as most energetic force which drives a nation. Due to based education system the top university provides world class education with good libraries, practical labs and infrastructure but the lower level university lacks this type of things in every aspect. Due to students below average deteriorates more and might end up getting pity jobs or may be even worse as unemployment.
Also, if we see our education system created in a way that students are subjected to explore all the subjects till their high school. Once they grow up and identify their aims then they are put into high level of education. So, small children should not be emphasized on education so that they can explore their interest in different fields such as music, arts or sports.
Finally, children aged from 5-10 years should be let free so that they can just enjoy their childhood. They should explore and learn things by their own. And government should invest on universities so that country produce a quality youth.
- Torreya Taxifolia tree decline and migration 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. Us 80
- Torreya Taxifolia tree decline and migration 80
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were cap 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 479, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... quality of youth in one country. But I dont feel spending money on education of you...
^^^^
Line 5, column 557, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... getting pity jobs or may be even worse as unemployment. Also, if we see our ed...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, may, second, so, then, i feel, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1942.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00515463918 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61505366791 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530927835052 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3631576302 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.210526316 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4210526316 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.26315789474 5.45110844103 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211369318137 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630033795788 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774992557601 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113361421681 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892764314192 0.0645574589148 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.