tpo40
Both the reading and listening parts offer two opposite views about the possibility of a permanent station on Venus. While the passage lists three main problems for a human presence on Venus surface, the lecturer, on the other hand, purposed a floating station in fifty kilometers above Venus surface in the atmosphere to overcome these problems.
First of all, the text mentioned to the high atmospheric pressure at Venus's surface, which is 90 times greater than on Earth's surface, as one of the main issues that halt the presence. On the other hand, the professor, claims that since by the increment of height the atmospheric pressure decreases, at the 50 kilometers above the Venus surface, the atmospheric pressure is equal to the atmospheric pressure on Earth surface. Consequently, the floating station can be a feasible solution for a human presence on Venus.
Secondly, the article highlights the impracticality of importing the oxygen and water from Earth, since Venus does possess no reservoirs for water and oxygen, as the second problem of living in Venus. On the contrary, the instructor said that as Venus mostly made up carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid, the chemical reaction by the sulfuric acid and carbon dioxide can be considered as the consistent supply for the water and oxygen production in Venus. Therefore, there is no concern about the water and oxygen regular supply from Earth, as Venus is independent for their production.
Finally, meanwhile, the passage bolded the little sunlight which reaches Venus surface as another issue living on Venus; the lecturer refutes this factor too. As he explains, the height of fifty kilometers above the surface causes more sunlight reaches the station. Furthermore, the solar power cells at this height have this chance to receive all the direct and reflected sunlight from the clouds, as the station is close to those clouds. Thus, the station, at this level, can reach sufficient sunlight to make the electricity.
- tpo 34-integ 80
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority. 62
- 9.The following appeared in a health newsletter."A ten-year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago, approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets, whereas today that num 46
- tpo 29.1 60
- 31.As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you t 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...atmosphere to overcome these problems. First of all, the text mentioned to the ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lution for a human presence on Venus. Secondly, the article highlights the imp...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s is independent for their production. Finally, meanwhile, the passage bolded t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 326.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1472392638 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67713219176 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503067484663 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 519.3 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 1.25165562914 559% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.8522356063 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.833333333 110.228320801 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 21.698381199 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.75 7.06452816374 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452870466885 0.272083759551 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166046854615 0.0996497079465 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501787474259 0.0662205650399 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257492166124 0.162205337803 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441907436778 0.0443174109184 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.3589403974 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.