TPO 52 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
am absolutely agreed. The rules should be determined in accordance with the public demands. The young are the future of a country and restricting them leads to making the future darker. There are some reasons that support my idea as follows:
The first one is that pushing the teens into more pressure, not only would not make any sense for them, but also makes them more critical about the government. In this way, the authorities produce more rebellious people and add to their negative points. Any revolution, as the history testifys, owes to youths. So the governments and people should avoid raging them just for survival.
Happiness of the society is the second reason. A happy and active community is based on the freshness of its young people. If one want to have a creative and frontier society in knowldege, should pay enough attention to the jouniors. Forcing the young to obey some rules, would make them reluctant to contributing in the progression of the cuontry. Moreover it, they would be hopeless and feel less freedom that is harmful at the stance of the exporting ginuse and clever scientists, instead of encouraging them to serving their country.
As the third reason I like to examplify an issue. Imagine that you are to build the future of your teen. Were it not for the presence of the good attitude, your hope (your teen) would not be submessive and it results in preshing your desires. How a government or society could build a better future by ruining the hopes of the young? It is clear that annoying young people by dectating them some rules, is not a good attitude that the government or older people, the parents of the youths, coud take.
All in all, it may be lots other objections and reasons. It does not work to limit the auotonomy of the young and extinguish their enthusiasm for a better life. It is a paradigm of this: "Garbage in, Garbage out".
- Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Some people argue that technological progress is always positive. Others dispute this. What is your view and why? 88
- Are parents the best teachers? 80
- TPO-25 - Integrated Writing Task 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Am
am absolutely agreed. The rules should be ...
^^
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ting in the progression of the cuontry. Moreover it, they would be hopeless and feel les...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 538, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ouraging them to serving their country. As the third reason I like to examplify an...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, third, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 330.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74545454545 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57749673906 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.9545452435 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.3 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.45110844103 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126416552084 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0387053105227 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0308149842813 0.0737576698707 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0670625698632 0.150856017488 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410967994417 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.