More and more people buy a wide range of household goods like
television, microwave oven and rice cooker. Do you think this is positive
or negative development?
Over the past decades, the development of technology has never failed to draw
public attention and provoke debates. Although an overwhelming majority of
families have possessed more than one piece of electrical device with the proliferation
of high-tech products in every walk of life, the issue as to whether it does more good
than harm or not remains controversial. In my opinion, household goods, if
properly used, can bring you more benefits than drawbacks.
On the one hand, household goods have improved the quality of life. In fact, thanks
to the sophisticated design, doing domestic chores ceases to be a bother. For instance,
a vacuum cleaner can help make even the carpeted floor dustless and a micro-wave
oven can make cooking a manageable and enjoyable process. Similar advantages also
apply to washing machines, dish-washers, dryers, and refrigerators. Thus, the time and
energy saved allow people to work and rest better. This example indicates that the
more free time you save due to having appliances, the more other things you are capable
of doing at your will.
On the other hand, the opponents may argue that it can be a potential threat to the
health of family members and the environment as a whole. Those who are against
buying a wide range of household goods hold their views for reasons. Firstly, the
convenience brought about by the appliances also encourage owners to adopt sedentary
lifestyle and inactivity. For instance, they deprive users of the possibilities to consume
a huge number of calories at home, which, in a long run, is likely to undermine their
health. Secondly, electrical household goods usually get updated at a high rate due to
the ever-advancing technology, and the accompanying mass production will drive the
exploration of natural resources.
In conclusion, nowadays electrical appliances bring both boons and banes. If they
are used carefully and scrupulously, its advantages will eclipse its disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-07 | nguyen nhi | 89 | view |
- The graphs below show the number of visits to and from the UK between 1979 and 1999, and some destinations of UK citizens traveling abroad. 67
- More and more people buy a wide range of household goods liketelevision, microwave oven and rice cooker. Do you think this is positiveor negative development? 89
- living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problem,as well as practical problems to extent what do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problem,as well as practical problems to extent what do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- more and more people buy a wide range of household goods like television, microwave oven and rice cooker do you think this is a positive or negative development 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 56, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...oducts in every walk of life, the issue as to whether it does more good than harm or not rem...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35873015873 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98013917944 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644444444444 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4355641214 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.5 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6875 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 25.0 4.38176352705 571% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217539572993 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556107220738 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664494822622 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0443467352772 0.151304729494 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570010706743 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.