Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this can not be changed, while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Since industrialisation, we are exploiting nature to its extreme. A section of society believes that time has slipped from our hands and there is nothing left to act upon, whereas other believes that we have time to take decisive action to curtail its effects. In my opinion, we have time to reverse the damages done to our mother nature by reducing pollution and planting trees.
To begin with, pollution is the biggest contributor in damaging our ecosystem. Everyday vehicles and industries are emitting tonnes of carbon and other global warming gases, which is raising earth’s temperature by 0.25% in every five years. We must change our ways of living by limiting the ways of fossil fuels in transportation and industrial sector by switching to renewable sources of energy. A recent initiative of Indian Government is to switch all existing public transport system from petrol or diesel to battery operated fleets in order to curb pollution by 2025.
Additionally, limiting the burning of fossil fuel alone with not help tremendously unless we device a methodology to lower pollution level. We must plant more trees that feed on carbon dioxide and other pollutants present in air. This will not only help in trapping harmful gases, but it will also help in reducing earth’s temperature and the icing on the cake will be by making our surrounding green.
On the flip side, it is been long debated that we have damaged our earth to a limit where we do not have enough time to undo devastating effects. Many species are extinct and lots have been marked as endangered, but we cannot sit idle and wait for the catastrophic failure of our planet. We must put our undivided best to heal our mother nature and there are huge changes that we will succeed.
To conclude, we have damaged our planet by burning fossil fuel and we must stop this practice by switching to renewable sources of energy by planting trees to tap pollutants. To my mind, it is not too late to save our planet and we must deploy measures to switch to clean energy and enhance our green cover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | 1aja | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | jobanjeet | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | joehunt | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | Singh@141088 | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Sai sushma | 73 | view |
- People who read for pleasure have better imagination and language skills than those who prefer watching TV. To what extent do you agree? 84
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists, but not local people. Why this is the case? What can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 84
- Tourism is encouraged in many countries. Does tourism brings more advantages or disadvantages to a country? 84
- City council is planning to pull down one of the historic buildings in your town because they do not have funds to renovate it. As a citizen, you don’t want it to happen. Write a letter to the city council and sayWhat is the importance of the building?W 78
- The restoration of old buildings in major cities throughout the world involves enormous expenditure. This money would bring more benefits if it was used to provide new housing and road development. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, whereas, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85674157303 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68141041439 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542134831461 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6035459321 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.266666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7333333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46666666667 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0457477753491 0.244688304435 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0180177120504 0.084324248473 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0240229097227 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0306094657853 0.151304729494 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256044260716 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.