The first car appeared on British roads in 1888. By the year 2000, there may be as many as 29 million vehicles on the British roads. Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use.
To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
At the 21st century, transportation is an essential part of the daily life. Since the introduction of the first car at Britain in 1888, the amount of traffic has increased up to nearly 30 millions by 2000. Due to the overwhelming growth, some people said other type of vehicles should be put in use more effectively and worldwide rules needed to be set to get car’s owners in check. From my point of view, I personally agree with these requirements, and here’s why.
First, private-owned vehicles can cause many problems to the society. The environment is one of the most concerned problems in the world. Yearly, the total amount of exhaust produced by cars at Britain is 100 thousand tons, and this causes an enormous consequence on the ozone layer. Next, too many vehicles on the road can trigger traffic jams. Not only wasting time of the drivers, but it also puts some heavy effects on the infrastructure of the transportation system, especially considered about the subsidence of roads and highways. For example, the 11-day traffic jam at China, caused a road from a nice and flat one, to a total mess with holes as big as an elephant on the road.
Furthermore, the use of public transportation methods and the introduction of international laws are the best way to solve the above problems. They run on a scheduled basis, can only serve a predefined number of people, and they are easy to manage because they’re all the same. Moreover, the ratio of CO2 produced by a person to the vehicle will be reduced. It means we can control the exhaustion and improve it to be lower and lower. Traffic jams are going to be solved completely, due to the amount of people a public vehicle can handle. With the international laws, the numbers of cars can be controlled by organizations worldwide such as the United Nations. By this, they can limit, put flexible rules to ensure they can controlled the way to buy and use cars in the best way.
In conclusion, the idea of putting public transport vehicles into use and apply laws is a good one. In my opinion, we should do this quick and fast, so we can solve a lot problems, meanwhile save a lot of time to do other jobs to improve this world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-10 | Szprawstyle | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | Naive Dinosaur | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-31 | elizabeth.queijo | 67 | view |
| 2018-09-11 | thoaily | 67 | view |
- Some people believe that if people are allowed to work after the age of 60, it could cause problems. Do you agree or disagree? 11
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy.The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages.To what extend do you agree or disagree? 84
- The charts below show the main methods of transportation for people travelling to one university for work or study in 2004 and 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- Some people believed that digital technologies in the home may brings benefit to people. Others consider that people are too dependent on digital technologies nowadays.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 89
- The table below gives information about a restaurant’s average sales in three different branches in 2016.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 731, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'control'
Suggestion: control
..., put flexible rules to ensure they can controlled the way to buy and use cars in the best...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, all the same, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82220928002 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1617783868 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7894736842 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5263157895 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31578947368 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234626522458 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726678112348 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525907940207 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134558671696 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504936543879 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.