Technocorporation is our top pick for the investment this term. We urge all our clients to invest in this new company. For the first time in ten years, a company that has developed a satellite technology has been approved by the FTA to compete with current satellite provider. The company is techno corporation. A consumer survey last year indicated that over eighty percent of the respondents were dissatisfied with the current satellite television provider and would want to switch to another provider if the industry were not monopoly.Thus , the new venture of technocorporation into satellite television will prove to be highly profitable for those who invest now.
Techcorporation is the satellite provider where people should invest in, for high profits. The author came to this conclusion with some claims made in the argument but these claims made are lacking the answers to several questions that came up when analysed. Some of the assumptions made might be true might not be true. Below are the assumptions which need to be answered more cogently to make the argument more reasonable.
To begin with the author has picked the Techcorporation as top pick for investment. What are the factors author has considered and what are the proofs of this new company that it is trustworthy and clients can put in their money without any second thoughts. The author does mention that FTA has approved Technocorporation. But author failed to delineate who FTA is and what is their role in Satellite Television Providers. If author had claimed that it is the canonical body who look into the Fundamental principles of Company who offer services all over the area and it is recognized and approved by these National Body of Satellite Television Rights then people would have invested with more faith.
Further author claimed that a consumer survey conducted last year showed people were dissatisfied with current Television provider. Perhaps this survey might have been organized by Local body and not the National body. It fails to answer who had organized the survey. It is possible that people might be dissatisfied with current satellite TV provider for number of reasons such as bad weather in the area. Even if Techcorporation start providing services it is not necessary their services will not be affected by weather. It is also possible that area of these eighty percent dissatisfied people might not be getting covered by current satellite television provider or the area is located in remote region where network is weak. If author had covered these all claims in argument it would have been more reasonable and investors would not have made assumptions.
The conclusion made by author to invest in Techcorporation as it stands is flawed. It fails to answer number of questions which eventually make the argument weak. Above are the reasonable answers to all the questions which could have strengthen the argument and made more convincing for the investors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-23 | sikrewalrohit96@gmail.com | 59 | view |
| 2019-08-17 | echoingdowns | 83 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | rautella | 30 | view |
| 2019-01-06 | lavish | 59 | view |
| 2018-10-04 | ANKITA PAL | 53 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- Technocorporation is our top pick for the investment this term. We urge all our clients to invest in this new company. For the first time in ten years, a company that has developed a satellite technology has been approved by the FTA to compete with curren 30
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 50
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 378 350
No. of Characters: 1894 1500
No. of Different Words: 167 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.409 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.011 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.772 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 137 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 99 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 72 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 47 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.895 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.397 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.474 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.318 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.503 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.077 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...l questions that came up when analysed. Some of the assumptions made might be true might no...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...would have invested with more faith. Further author claimed that a consumer survey c...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 408, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...easons such as bad weather in the area. Even if Techcorporation start providing service...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'strengthened'.
Suggestion: strengthened
...s to all the questions which could have strengthen the argument and made more convincing f...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, second, so, then, as to, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.6327345309 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 13.6137724551 125% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 28.8173652695 94% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 55.5748502994 74% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1926.0 2260.96107784 85% => OK
No of words: 378.0 441.139720559 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09523809524 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82115786883 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 204.123752495 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.439153439153 0.468620217663 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.0 705.55239521 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.8060796919 57.8364921388 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.368421053 119.503703932 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8947368421 23.324526521 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57894736842 5.70786347227 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160415473938 0.218282227539 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556820804081 0.0743258471296 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049843067093 0.0701772020484 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103055027426 0.128457276422 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528751039951 0.0628817314937 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.3799401198 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.3550499002 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.5979740519 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.32208582834 94% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 98.500998004 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.